Types of Capital and Their Measurement

ABSTRACT Capital is notoriously heterogeneous, including physical, intangible, human and natural capitals, and this heterogeneity can make measurement very difficult. To bring structure to the wide range of capital assets, and inform measurement, we define five dimensions for classifying capital types: produced versus non‐produced; fixed versus non‐fixed; tangible versus intangible; standardized versus non‐standardized; and exclusive versus non‐exclusive. By cross‐classifying these dimensions, we identify a range of capital types and draw lessons for measurement methodology. We find that assets are less difficult to measure when they are standardized and exclusive while non‐standardized assets are hard to measure due to a lack of comparators and non‐exclusive assets are hard to value since the market value does not include all its social value. We then suggest possible measurement strategies for the harder‐to‐measure capital types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Income and Wealth
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.70065
Primary Topic
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Types of Capital and Their Measurement

Josh Martin, Rachel Soloveichik, Leonard Nakamura
Review of Income and Wealth
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
article

Types of Capital and Their Measurement

Josh Martin, Rachel Soloveichik, Leonard Nakamura
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Capital is notoriously heterogeneous, including physical, intangible, human and natural capitals, and this heterogeneity can make measurement very difficult. To bring structure to the wide range of capital assets, and inform measurement, we define five dimensions for classifying capital types: produced versus non‐produced; fixed versus non‐fixed; tangible versus intangible; standardized versus non‐standardized; and exclusive versus non‐exclusive. By cross‐classifying these dimensions, we identify a range of capital types and draw lessons for measurement methodology. We find that assets are less difficult to measure when they are standardized and exclusive while non‐standardized assets are hard to measure due to a lack of comparators and non‐exclusive assets are hard to value since the market value does not include all its social value. We then suggest possible measurement strategies for the harder‐to‐measure capital types.

Review of Income and WealthVol. 72(2)
Bureau of Economic Analysis (US), Bank of England (GB), Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.