Impact of Uncorrected Astigmatism on Image Quality With Dual-focus Optics—A Modelling Study

Abstract Purpose Compare the impact of uncorrected astigmatism in a single-vision (SV) and a dual-focus (DF) optical lens models at the centre and limits of the interval of Sturm (IOS). Methods With the rule (WTR) astigmatism (up to 2.0 D) was added to SV and DF models. Wavefronts were constructed from Zernike polynomials over the full pupil (SV) or on a zone-by-zone basis (DF). The DF model included an annular zone with +2.0 D of added power and a typical decentration from the pupil centre. Geometrical ray tracing and wave optics were used to compute point-spread functions (PSF), modulation transfer functions (MTF) and simulated letter images at the centre, anterior and posterior limits of the IOS. Results Simple line foci were observed with the SV model, but more complicated PSFs containing circular, elliptical and double orthogonal line components were created when astigmatism was added to the DF model. Simulated images in both the SV and DF models were degraded with increasing levels of astigmatism. In the absence of astigmatism, lens-only MTFs were reduced by ~45% in the DF model. As astigmatism levels increased, the MTF values were reduced in both models, reducing the differences between them. In the presence of ocular aberrations, MTFs with astigmatism >1.0 D were almost identical in the SV and DF models. Conclusions The modelling shows that uncorrected astigmatism remains a major contributor to image degradation in eyes corrected with a DF contact lens, suggesting that astigmatic eyes being fitted with dual-focus or bifocal contact lenses would benefit from a toric correction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00227-9
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Impact of Uncorrected Astigmatism on Image Quality With Dual-focus Optics—A Modelling Study

Pete S Kollbaum, Arthur T. Bradley, Matt Jaskulski
2 links
Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Impact of Uncorrected Astigmatism on Image Quality With Dual-focus Optics—A Modelling Study

Pete S Kollbaum, Arthur T. Bradley, Matt Jaskulski
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Compare the impact of uncorrected astigmatism in a single-vision (SV) and a dual-focus (DF) optical lens models at the centre and limits of the interval of Sturm (IOS). Methods With the rule (WTR) astigmatism (up to 2.0 D) was added to SV and DF models. Wavefronts were constructed from Zernike polynomials over the full pupil (SV) or on a zone-by-zone basis (DF). The DF model included an annular zone with +2.0 D of added power and a typical decentration from the pupil centre. Geometrical ray tracing and wave optics were used to compute point-spread functions (PSF), modulation transfer functions (MTF) and simulated letter images at the centre, anterior and posterior limits of the IOS. Results Simple line foci were observed with the SV model, but more complicated PSFs containing circular, elliptical and double orthogonal line components were created when astigmatism was added to the DF model. Simulated images in both the SV and DF models were degraded with increasing levels of astigmatism. In the absence of astigmatism, lens-only MTFs were reduced by ~45% in the DF model. As astigmatism levels increased, the MTF values were reduced in both models, reducing the differences between them. In the presence of ocular aberrations, MTFs with astigmatism >1.0 D were almost identical in the SV and DF models. Conclusions The modelling shows that uncorrected astigmatism remains a major contributor to image degradation in eyes corrected with a DF contact lens, suggesting that astigmatic eyes being fitted with dual-focus or bifocal contact lenses would benefit from a toric correction.

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics
Indiana University Bloomington (US), Indiana University (US)
CooperVision
Good health and well-being
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon