Comparing cardiac index and left ventricular ejection fraction in ICU patients with sepsis

BACKGROUND: The optimal parameter to assess cardiovascular function in sepsis is currently unknown. We investigated whether echocardiography-derived cardiac index offers superior haemodynamic monitoring and prognostic value compared to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in ICU patients with sepsis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre cohort study in ICU patients with sepsis admitted between April 2016 and December 2021 that received a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) within seven days of sepsis onset. Correlation between CI and LVEF was assessed using the Spearman rank test. The 90-day mortality rates of normal, low and high CI and LVEF subgroups were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association of CI and LVEF phenotypes with mortality. RESULTS: 1731 patients were included and were aged 62 years (IQR 47-72), with 21% (n = 367) having septic shock. Ninety-day mortality was 32.5% (n = 561). Although CI and LVEF demonstrated moderate correlation (r = 0.51 (0.47-0.54), one-third of patients in a given CI subgroup were classified into a discordant LVEF subgroup. The 90-day mortality rates of low and high CI (54%, 54%) and low and high LVEF subgroups (43%, 59%) were broadly comparable and were higher than their normal CI (20%) and LVEF (23%) counterparts respectively. After regression analysis, low and high CI independently associated with mortality (OR 2.6 (1.8-3.7; p < 0.001), (OR 3.4 (2.7-4.4; p < 0.001), as did low and high LVEF subgroups (OR 1.6 (1.2-2.3; p = 0.004), OR 3.2 (2.4-4.3; p < 0.001). Stratifying CI subgroups into low, normal and high LVEF (and vice-versa) was associated with significantly different mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although CI and LVEF were modestly correlated, this association weakened when either parameter was abnormal, highlighting their non-equivalence as haemodynamic parameters. While both markers exhibited comparable associations with mortality, their combination substantially improved prognostic accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Critical Care
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2026.155608
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing cardiac index and left ventricular ejection fraction in ICU patients with sepsis

Jaimin Patel, Dhruv Parekh, Minesh Chotalia, Muzzammil Ali et al.
Journal of Critical Care
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Comparing cardiac index and left ventricular ejection fraction in ICU patients with sepsis

Jaimin Patel, Dhruv Parekh, Minesh Chotalia, Muzzammil Ali, Ravi Chotalia, Mansoor N. Bangash
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal parameter to assess cardiovascular function in sepsis is currently unknown. We investigated whether echocardiography-derived cardiac index offers superior haemodynamic monitoring and prognostic value compared to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in ICU patients with sepsis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre cohort study in ICU patients with sepsis admitted between April 2016 and December 2021 that received a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) within seven days of sepsis onset. Correlation between CI and LVEF was assessed using the Spearman rank test. The 90-day mortality rates of normal, low and high CI and LVEF subgroups were compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association of CI and LVEF phenotypes with mortality. RESULTS: 1731 patients were included and were aged 62 years (IQR 47-72), with 21% (n = 367) having septic shock. Ninety-day mortality was 32.5% (n = 561). Although CI and LVEF demonstrated moderate correlation (r = 0.51 (0.47-0.54), one-third of patients in a given CI subgroup were classified into a discordant LVEF subgroup. The 90-day mortality rates of low and high CI (54%, 54%) and low and high LVEF subgroups (43%, 59%) were broadly comparable and were higher than their normal CI (20%) and LVEF (23%) counterparts respectively. After regression analysis, low and high CI independently associated with mortality (OR 2.6 (1.8-3.7; p < 0.001), (OR 3.4 (2.7-4.4; p < 0.001), as did low and high LVEF subgroups (OR 1.6 (1.2-2.3; p = 0.004), OR 3.2 (2.4-4.3; p < 0.001). Stratifying CI subgroups into low, normal and high LVEF (and vice-versa) was associated with significantly different mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: Although CI and LVEF were modestly correlated, this association weakened when either parameter was abnormal, highlighting their non-equivalence as haemodynamic parameters. While both markers exhibited comparable associations with mortality, their combination substantially improved prognostic accuracy.

Journal of Critical CareVol. 94
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), Lincoln County Hospital (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.