The further away the better? Factors influencing the public’s location preferences for mobile phone base stations. A 10-country study.

New mobile phone base stations are frequently opposed by the public, even though mobile phones are used by most of the population. While such reaction has often been described as NIMBYism (‘not in my back yard’), this label offers little insight into the psychological mechanisms underlying such opposition. The present mixed-methods research moves beyond a simple NIMBY interpretation through an in-depth investigation of public location preferences for 4G- plus 5G-capable base stations. Study 1 included six focus groups conducted in December 2022, and Study 2 was a ten-country survey (n = 10,358) conducted between September-December 2023. In both studies, participants were asked to select their preferred base station site from six hypothetical locations and indicate the reasons underlying their choice. Overall, many participants followed one of two siting approaches: approach A preferring locations ‘as far away as possible’, and approach B preferring the ‘least visually appealing’ location. While in Study 1 participants tended to follow approach B (16 out of 35), in Study 2 approach A was followed most frequently (53.6%). Among the reasons surveyed, distance had the greatest influence on location preferences, followed by reception, exposure to EMFs, and visual appearance. Distance and EMF were strongly correlated ( r = .531), which is why we assume that distance was a proxy for reduced exposure. However, greater distance can in fact increase overall exposure due to the increased power required for higher handset transmission. Age, gender, risk perception, exposure perception, use of 5G, acceptance and the expected impact of 5G were also associated with the choice of location. We found that widespread public communication efforts are needed to explain how 5G technology works, and that other issues such as visual amenity also need to be sensitively managed. Our results inform the broader discourse on base station siting: communication between stakeholders needs to be improved, fostering mutual understanding of preferences, and guiding decision-making for both telecommunication companies and the public. • Investigation into people’s location preferences for 4G- plus 5G-capable base stations • Mixed methods study, comprising focus groups and an international survey (n>10,000) • Preference for farther and visually unappealing locations found • Location preferences mainly influenced by considerations about distance

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.103070
Primary Topic
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The further away the better? Factors influencing the public’s location preferences for mobile phone base stations. A 10-country study.

Leanne Martin, Sarah Link, Nina Vaupotič, James Grellier et al.
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
article

The further away the better? Factors influencing the public’s location preferences for mobile phone base stations. A 10-country study.

Leanne Martin, Sarah Link, Nina Vaupotič, James Grellier, Christoph Boehmert, Ferdinand Abacioglu, Carolin Schulz, Mathew P. White, Marie Eggeling-Böcker
article en

Abstract

New mobile phone base stations are frequently opposed by the public, even though mobile phones are used by most of the population. While such reaction has often been described as NIMBYism (‘not in my back yard’), this label offers little insight into the psychological mechanisms underlying such opposition. The present mixed-methods research moves beyond a simple NIMBY interpretation through an in-depth investigation of public location preferences for 4G- plus 5G-capable base stations. Study 1 included six focus groups conducted in December 2022, and Study 2 was a ten-country survey (n = 10,358) conducted between September-December 2023. In both studies, participants were asked to select their preferred base station site from six hypothetical locations and indicate the reasons underlying their choice. Overall, many participants followed one of two siting approaches: approach A preferring locations ‘as far away as possible’, and approach B preferring the ‘least visually appealing’ location. While in Study 1 participants tended to follow approach B (16 out of 35), in Study 2 approach A was followed most frequently (53.6%). Among the reasons surveyed, distance had the greatest influence on location preferences, followed by reception, exposure to EMFs, and visual appearance. Distance and EMF were strongly correlated ( r = .531), which is why we assume that distance was a proxy for reduced exposure. However, greater distance can in fact increase overall exposure due to the increased power required for higher handset transmission. Age, gender, risk perception, exposure perception, use of 5G, acceptance and the expected impact of 5G were also associated with the choice of location. We found that widespread public communication efforts are needed to explain how 5G technology works, and that other issues such as visual amenity also need to be sensitively managed. Our results inform the broader discourse on base station siting: communication between stakeholders needs to be improved, fostering mutual understanding of preferences, and guiding decision-making for both telecommunication companies and the public. • Investigation into people’s location preferences for 4G- plus 5G-capable base stations • Mixed methods study, comprising focus groups and an international survey (n>10,000) • Preference for farther and visually unappealing locations found • Location preferences mainly influenced by considerations about distance

Journal of Environmental Psychology
University of Vienna (AT), University of Exeter (GB), Hochschule Aalen (DE), Vienna Biocenter (AT), IU International University of Applied Sciences (DE)
UK Research and Innovation, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.