Mapping the Landscape of State Medicaid Policy

Abstract Background Federal changes in Medicaid policy are the subject of significant national attention and debate. In contrast, state level Medicaid policies are more of a black box: difficult to keep track of and much less salient. These disparate attention and information contexts obscure the important ways that federal and state Medicaid policy compare. Methods We present original policy data that identifies nearly 4,000 proposed state Medicaid bills from 2018-2022 Results We show that the recent and ongoing federal emphases on reducing Medicaid expenditures are misaligned with state policy efforts. Moreover, though current federal policy changes have openly eschewed a focus on equity, we find that state level policies with an explicit emphasis on equity fare equally well (in terms of passage) as those without such an emphasis. Far from cutting their programs, states have consistently expanded access to Medicaid. And when state Medicaid policy focuses on equity, it remains politically feasible. Conclusion Altogether, we find that many state Medicaid programs innovate and expand in attempts to offer vital services to their constituents. In an era of federal policy retrenchment, this raises concerns about states’ capacity to continue such efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag110
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Landscape of State Medicaid Policy

Marissa Rivera, Jamila Michener, Grace Beals
Health Affairs Scholar
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Mapping the Landscape of State Medicaid Policy

Marissa Rivera, Jamila Michener, Grace Beals
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Federal changes in Medicaid policy are the subject of significant national attention and debate. In contrast, state level Medicaid policies are more of a black box: difficult to keep track of and much less salient. These disparate attention and information contexts obscure the important ways that federal and state Medicaid policy compare. Methods We present original policy data that identifies nearly 4,000 proposed state Medicaid bills from 2018-2022 Results We show that the recent and ongoing federal emphases on reducing Medicaid expenditures are misaligned with state policy efforts. Moreover, though current federal policy changes have openly eschewed a focus on equity, we find that state level policies with an explicit emphasis on equity fare equally well (in terms of passage) as those without such an emphasis. Far from cutting their programs, states have consistently expanded access to Medicaid. And when state Medicaid policy focuses on equity, it remains politically feasible. Conclusion Altogether, we find that many state Medicaid programs innovate and expand in attempts to offer vital services to their constituents. In an era of federal policy retrenchment, this raises concerns about states’ capacity to continue such efforts.

Health Affairs Scholar
Cornell University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mapping the Landscape of State Medicaid Policy — Marissa Rivera, Jamila Michener, et al. · Health Affairs Scholar (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS