1252 Struggling for Air? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sleep Apnea Guidance on Social Media

Abstract Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common and frequently underdiagnosed disorder characterized by recurrent upper-airway collapse during sleep, resulting in fragmented sleep, daytime fatigue, and increased cardiometabolic risk. With the growing popularity of online health information, TikTok has become a major platform through which patients learn about symptoms, diagnostic pathways, and treatment options. Despite its influence, little is known about the accuracy or quality of content shared on this platform for sleep apnea. This study evaluates the reliability, thematic content, and creator characteristics of TikTok videos addressing sleep apnea. Methods The top 50 videos under each of the hashtags #sleepapnea and #obstructivesleepapnea were collected using a publicly available scraping tool, yielding 100 unique videos. After excluding non-English posts, 97 videos remained. Two independent reviewers categorized creator type (medical vs non-medical) and video style (informational, personal, or humorous). Informational content was evaluated using DISCERN, modified DISCERN, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Overall video quality was assessed using the 5-point Global Quality Scale. Statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact tests and unpaired t-tests. Results Among 97 videos, 52 were informational, 27 personal, and 18 humorous. Common themes included diagnostic processes, treatment options, lifestyle factors, physiologic explanations, and symptom-management tips. Informational videos demonstrated average DISCERN scores of 36.90 ± 7.17 (out of 80) and mDISCERN scores of 2.53 ± 0.42 (out of 5). PEMAT scores showed 78.7% understandability and 63.2% actionability. Personal videos received significantly more views than informational videos (p=0.0088), while informational videos had higher Global Quality scores (p=0.0001). Medical professionals produced significantly higher-quality content overall (p=0.0001), though no significant differences were found in views or interactions between medical and non-medical creators. Conclusion TikTok content related to sleep apnea varies widely in accuracy and quality. Personal, non-informational videos attract more engagement than medically accurate content, highlighting an opportunity for clinicians to create accessible, evidence-based educational materials. Increasing expert participation on social media may improve public understanding of sleep apnea and support appropriate care-seeking. Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.1251
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1252 Struggling for Air? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sleep Apnea Guidance on Social Media

Rachel Kaye, Priyanka Mehta, Jay Kavia, Alexandra Filipkowski et al.
SLEEP
Social Media in Health Education
article

1252 Struggling for Air? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Sleep Apnea Guidance on Social Media

Rachel Kaye, Priyanka Mehta, Jay Kavia, Alexandra Filipkowski, Grace Smithwick, Manya Sinha, Wayne Hsueh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common and frequently underdiagnosed disorder characterized by recurrent upper-airway collapse during sleep, resulting in fragmented sleep, daytime fatigue, and increased cardiometabolic risk. With the growing popularity of online health information, TikTok has become a major platform through which patients learn about symptoms, diagnostic pathways, and treatment options. Despite its influence, little is known about the accuracy or quality of content shared on this platform for sleep apnea. This study evaluates the reliability, thematic content, and creator characteristics of TikTok videos addressing sleep apnea. Methods The top 50 videos under each of the hashtags #sleepapnea and #obstructivesleepapnea were collected using a publicly available scraping tool, yielding 100 unique videos. After excluding non-English posts, 97 videos remained. Two independent reviewers categorized creator type (medical vs non-medical) and video style (informational, personal, or humorous). Informational content was evaluated using DISCERN, modified DISCERN, and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). Overall video quality was assessed using the 5-point Global Quality Scale. Statistical comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact tests and unpaired t-tests. Results Among 97 videos, 52 were informational, 27 personal, and 18 humorous. Common themes included diagnostic processes, treatment options, lifestyle factors, physiologic explanations, and symptom-management tips. Informational videos demonstrated average DISCERN scores of 36.90 ± 7.17 (out of 80) and mDISCERN scores of 2.53 ± 0.42 (out of 5). PEMAT scores showed 78.7% understandability and 63.2% actionability. Personal videos received significantly more views than informational videos (p=0.0088), while informational videos had higher Global Quality scores (p=0.0001). Medical professionals produced significantly higher-quality content overall (p=0.0001), though no significant differences were found in views or interactions between medical and non-medical creators. Conclusion TikTok content related to sleep apnea varies widely in accuracy and quality. Personal, non-informational videos attract more engagement than medically accurate content, highlighting an opportunity for clinicians to create accessible, evidence-based educational materials. Increasing expert participation on social media may improve public understanding of sleep apnea and support appropriate care-seeking. Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Rutgers New Jersey Medical School (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Media in Health Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.