A comparison of preeclampsia screening using clinical risk factors and the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm

Aspirin can prevent most preterm preeclampsia in high-risk women. The risk can be estimated either by considering clinical factors or by using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm, which considers placental growth factor (PlGF) with blood pressure and other markers. Among nulliparous women, a low FMF risk is associated with low incidences of preeclampsia (<2.5%) and preterm preeclampsia (<0.5%) and a high FMF risk is associated with high incidences of preeclampsia (>6%) and preterm preeclampsia (>1.5%; P < 0.001), regardless of clinical risk factors. Where available, the FMF algorithm including PlGF should be the only tool used for preeclampsia screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2026.103391
Primary Topic
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of preeclampsia screening using clinical risk factors and the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm

Jo-Ann Jonhson, Nan Okun, Francois Audibert, Yves Giguère et al.
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
article

A comparison of preeclampsia screening using clinical risk factors and the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm

Jo-Ann Jonhson, Nan Okun, Francois Audibert, Yves Giguère, Louise Ghesquiere, Emmanuel Bujold, Jean-Claude Forest, Paul Guerby
article en

Abstract

Aspirin can prevent most preterm preeclampsia in high-risk women. The risk can be estimated either by considering clinical factors or by using the Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm, which considers placental growth factor (PlGF) with blood pressure and other markers. Among nulliparous women, a low FMF risk is associated with low incidences of preeclampsia (<2.5%) and preterm preeclampsia (<0.5%) and a high FMF risk is associated with high incidences of preeclampsia (>6%) and preterm preeclampsia (>1.5%; P < 0.001), regardless of clinical risk factors. Where available, the FMF algorithm including PlGF should be the only tool used for preeclampsia screening.

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Université Laval (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Université Laval, Fondation Jean-Louis Lévesque, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A comparison of preeclampsia screening using clinical risk factors and the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithm — Jo-Ann Jonhson, Nan Okun, et al. · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS