Safety Risk Calculation and Assessment of Mining Faces Based on Adversarial Interpretive Structural Modeling and the Bayesian Network

To improve risk control at coal mining faces and reduce accident risks, this study first extracts high–frequency risk factors from 171 valid coal mining face accident cases (2020–2023) and integrates synthesis of the literature to establish a 21–factor risk indicator system covering human–machine–environment–management dimensions, and invites 10 senior experts in coal mine safety–covering mining engineering, safety science and engineering, mine ventilation, geological disaster prevention and coal mine safety management–for evaluation. Secondly, a hierarchical structure of factors is developed based on adversarial interpretive structural modeling (AISM), and the driving force and dependence of each factor are analyzed using the matrix impact cross–reference multiplication applied to a classification (MICMAC). A fuzzy Bayesian network (FBN) model is then constructed with the AISM structure as a topological constraint to clarify factor relationships and quantify the risk propagation uncertainty. Finally, an empirical analysis is conducted using the X Coal Mine. The results indicate that the “illegal and irregular organization of production” is the root control factor. The risk probability of the mining face is 86.1%, with “inadequate specialized prevention and control” having a high occurrence probability, and “illegal operation” and “illegal command” showing the most significant probability changes. Sensitivity analysis identifies “inadequate specialized prevention and control” as the most sensitive factor, which, together with the environmental factors, falls into the Level I unacceptable risk category. This research determines risk control priorities and provides a theoretical basis for coal mine safety management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104624
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety Risk Calculation and Assessment of Mining Faces Based on Adversarial Interpretive Structural Modeling and the Bayesian Network

Zhaoran Zhang, Jianxue Li, Wei Jiang
Applied Sciences
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Safety Risk Calculation and Assessment of Mining Faces Based on Adversarial Interpretive Structural Modeling and the Bayesian Network

Zhaoran Zhang, Jianxue Li, Wei Jiang
article en

Abstract

To improve risk control at coal mining faces and reduce accident risks, this study first extracts high–frequency risk factors from 171 valid coal mining face accident cases (2020–2023) and integrates synthesis of the literature to establish a 21–factor risk indicator system covering human–machine–environment–management dimensions, and invites 10 senior experts in coal mine safety–covering mining engineering, safety science and engineering, mine ventilation, geological disaster prevention and coal mine safety management–for evaluation. Secondly, a hierarchical structure of factors is developed based on adversarial interpretive structural modeling (AISM), and the driving force and dependence of each factor are analyzed using the matrix impact cross–reference multiplication applied to a classification (MICMAC). A fuzzy Bayesian network (FBN) model is then constructed with the AISM structure as a topological constraint to clarify factor relationships and quantify the risk propagation uncertainty. Finally, an empirical analysis is conducted using the X Coal Mine. The results indicate that the “illegal and irregular organization of production” is the root control factor. The risk probability of the mining face is 86.1%, with “inadequate specialized prevention and control” having a high occurrence probability, and “illegal operation” and “illegal command” showing the most significant probability changes. Sensitivity analysis identifies “inadequate specialized prevention and control” as the most sensitive factor, which, together with the environmental factors, falls into the Level I unacceptable risk category. This research determines risk control priorities and provides a theoretical basis for coal mine safety management.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(10)
North China University of Technology (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.