0184 Effects of Olfactory Stimuli on Vigilance and Sleepiness During Sleep Inertia: Preliminary Results

Abstract Introduction Sleep inertia is a transient period of impaired function upon waking and poses risks for workers who must act quickly after abrupt arousal. We examined whether exposure to an arousing odorant upon waking is associated with greater vigilance and less sleepiness compared to no odorant. Methods Thirteen adults (10F, mean age 25 ± 3.7 range 21-35 years) completed 2 nights of PSG-monitored sleep with four arousals, each after 5 minutes of continuous slow-wave or REM sleep. Participants were exposed to no odor or a proprietary scent blend (PSB) designed to stimulate the trigeminal system via room diffusion in a counterbalanced within-subjects design. The odorant was delivered throughout each 20-minute arousal from 30 seconds beforehand. Vigilance was measured with two 5-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Tests (PVT; variables: mean reaction time (RT) and lapse count) occurring 1 and 11 minutes into the arousals. Participants completed a Visual Analog Sleepiness Scale (VASS) at minute 17. Separate linear mixed models with random intercept for participants predicted PVT and VASS variables from odor condition, accounting for night and arousal number. PVT models included a variable for PVT number within arousals interacted with odor condition to test whether PSB accelerated task performance relative to no odor. Results A trend was seen for faster RTs in the PSB condition vs. null (PSB: M=679.5 ms ± 609.5; Null: M=858.9 ms ±1047.0), b = −173.31, SE = 90.44, t(172.65) = −1.93, p = .057. Night 2 (b = 446.86, p < .001) and later arousals (b = 93.19, p = .018) had significantly slower RTs. For lapses, Night 2 (b = 3.56, p < .001), later arousals (b = 1.19, p = .001), and timing (first vs. second) (b = -1.89, p = .02) were significant predictors. For VASS, Night 2 was associated with lower subjective sleepiness (VASS: M=84.2 ± 9.5); (Null M=82.6 ± 14.7); (b = -4.28, p = .025). No interactions were significant. Conclusion PSB exposure during nocturnal arousals showed a trend toward improved vigilance (faster RT) but not reduced sleepiness. These findings contribute to limited research on whether olfactory stimulation can mitigate sleep inertia. Support (if any) RI Commerce Corporation; P20GM139743

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0184
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0184 Effects of Olfactory Stimuli on Vigilance and Sleepiness During Sleep Inertia: Preliminary Results

Eliza Van Reen, Mary Carskadon, Caroline Gredvig-Ardito, Chloe Lambert et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

0184 Effects of Olfactory Stimuli on Vigilance and Sleepiness During Sleep Inertia: Preliminary Results

Eliza Van Reen, Mary Carskadon, Caroline Gredvig-Ardito, Chloe Lambert, Shreya Varrier, Sarah Thomas
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Sleep inertia is a transient period of impaired function upon waking and poses risks for workers who must act quickly after abrupt arousal. We examined whether exposure to an arousing odorant upon waking is associated with greater vigilance and less sleepiness compared to no odorant. Methods Thirteen adults (10F, mean age 25 ± 3.7 range 21-35 years) completed 2 nights of PSG-monitored sleep with four arousals, each after 5 minutes of continuous slow-wave or REM sleep. Participants were exposed to no odor or a proprietary scent blend (PSB) designed to stimulate the trigeminal system via room diffusion in a counterbalanced within-subjects design. The odorant was delivered throughout each 20-minute arousal from 30 seconds beforehand. Vigilance was measured with two 5-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Tests (PVT; variables: mean reaction time (RT) and lapse count) occurring 1 and 11 minutes into the arousals. Participants completed a Visual Analog Sleepiness Scale (VASS) at minute 17. Separate linear mixed models with random intercept for participants predicted PVT and VASS variables from odor condition, accounting for night and arousal number. PVT models included a variable for PVT number within arousals interacted with odor condition to test whether PSB accelerated task performance relative to no odor. Results A trend was seen for faster RTs in the PSB condition vs. null (PSB: M=679.5 ms ± 609.5; Null: M=858.9 ms ±1047.0), b = −173.31, SE = 90.44, t(172.65) = −1.93, p = .057. Night 2 (b = 446.86, p < .001) and later arousals (b = 93.19, p = .018) had significantly slower RTs. For lapses, Night 2 (b = 3.56, p < .001), later arousals (b = 1.19, p = .001), and timing (first vs. second) (b = -1.89, p = .02) were significant predictors. For VASS, Night 2 was associated with lower subjective sleepiness (VASS: M=84.2 ± 9.5); (Null M=82.6 ± 14.7); (b = -4.28, p = .025). No interactions were significant. Conclusion PSB exposure during nocturnal arousals showed a trend toward improved vigilance (faster RT) but not reduced sleepiness. These findings contribute to limited research on whether olfactory stimulation can mitigate sleep inertia. Support (if any) RI Commerce Corporation; P20GM139743

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Brown University (US), Bradley Hospital (US), Circadian (United States) (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.