Where We're Going, We Won't Need Eyes to See: Distributional Range Size Drivers of European Subterranean Spiders

ABSTRACT Aim Understanding why closely related species can have drastically different distributional range sizes is a fundamental question in biology. However, answering this question is challenging due to the multiple inter‐related factors that shape species distributions, particularly in continental regions, where unclear ecological and geographic boundaries and long evolutionary histories obscure the main drivers of range size variation. Island‐like subterranean ecosystems such as caves provide ideal models for studying species' biogeography and evolution due to their well‐defined boundaries, reduced species pools, and often easily defined abiotic limiting factors. We aim to better understand the factors influencing distributional range size in subterranean species. Location Continental Europe. Taxon Spiders (Araneae). Methods We calculated the range size of all subterranean spiders in Europe. We used Variation Partitioning Analysis to determine the relative influence of phenotypic subterranean‐related traits, historical factors, and potential sampling biases on various range size metrics while controlling for phylogenetic effects via different approaches. Results Subterranean phenotypic related traits emerged as one of the most significant determinants of range size. In addition, climatic events and conditions during the Last Glacial Maximum also played an important role in shaping the species' range sizes. Conversely, sampling biases, approximated as the density of roads and research institutions across the study area, had limited influence. We also detected that closely related species typically exhibited more similar range sizes. Main Conclusions While subterranean related traits emerged as the main predictor of range size variation, the processes shaping species' range sizes are complex and multifactorial. In addition to morphological specialization, historical events, phylogenetic relationships, and other unaccounted factors have also played a significant role in determining the current distributions of European subterranean spider species. Despite these uncertainties, our study represents an initial step toward understanding range size variation in subterranean spiders, with implications for cave evolution, subterranean biogeographic patterns, and conservation priorities—particularly given the close link between range size and extinction risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biogeography
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.70237
Primary Topic
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Where We're Going, We Won't Need Eyes to See: Distributional Range Size Drivers of European Subterranean Spiders

Martina Pavlek, Giuseppe Nicolosi, Lorenzo Cresi, Adrià Bellvert et al.
Journal of Biogeography
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
article

Where We're Going, We Won't Need Eyes to See: Distributional Range Size Drivers of European Subterranean Spiders

Martina Pavlek, Giuseppe Nicolosi, Lorenzo Cresi, Adrià Bellvert, Stefano Mammola
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Understanding why closely related species can have drastically different distributional range sizes is a fundamental question in biology. However, answering this question is challenging due to the multiple inter‐related factors that shape species distributions, particularly in continental regions, where unclear ecological and geographic boundaries and long evolutionary histories obscure the main drivers of range size variation. Island‐like subterranean ecosystems such as caves provide ideal models for studying species' biogeography and evolution due to their well‐defined boundaries, reduced species pools, and often easily defined abiotic limiting factors. We aim to better understand the factors influencing distributional range size in subterranean species. Location Continental Europe. Taxon Spiders (Araneae). Methods We calculated the range size of all subterranean spiders in Europe. We used Variation Partitioning Analysis to determine the relative influence of phenotypic subterranean‐related traits, historical factors, and potential sampling biases on various range size metrics while controlling for phylogenetic effects via different approaches. Results Subterranean phenotypic related traits emerged as one of the most significant determinants of range size. In addition, climatic events and conditions during the Last Glacial Maximum also played an important role in shaping the species' range sizes. Conversely, sampling biases, approximated as the density of roads and research institutions across the study area, had limited influence. We also detected that closely related species typically exhibited more similar range sizes. Main Conclusions While subterranean related traits emerged as the main predictor of range size variation, the processes shaping species' range sizes are complex and multifactorial. In addition to morphological specialization, historical events, phylogenetic relationships, and other unaccounted factors have also played a significant role in determining the current distributions of European subterranean spider species. Despite these uncertainties, our study represents an initial step toward understanding range size variation in subterranean spiders, with implications for cave evolution, subterranean biogeographic patterns, and conservation priorities—particularly given the close link between range size and extinction risk.

Journal of BiogeographyVol. 53(5)
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Milan (IT), Universität Greifswald (DE), University of Catania (IT), Ruđer Bošković Institute (HR), Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IT), Finnish Museum of Natural History (FI), Croatian Science Foundation (HR), Croatian Biospeleological Society, Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
European Commission, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.