1056 Targeted Dream Incubation’s Impact on Dream Self-Efficacy, Nightmares, Suicide, PTSD, and Insomnia

Abstract Introduction Targeted Dream Incubation (TDI) is the process of giving an individual auditory cues (i.e., “think of a tree”) while they are falling asleep, with the goal of shaping dream content (into something such as a tree). Recent research has demonstrated TDI may be able to increase dream self-efficacy (DSE) and influence other mental health outcomes. Thus, our study explored how TDI impacted DSE, nightmare distress, PTSD, insomnia, and thoughts of suicide in a non-clinical sample and a sample that experiences frequent trauma-related nightmares (TRNs). Methods Our study included N = 30 participants; n = 20 received one 90-minunte session of TDI and n = 10 received one 90-minute nap instead of TDI. Within the TDI condition there were two groups, one group that experienced TRNs (n = 10) and one group that did not (n = 10). All participants completed surveys immediately prior to TDI or nap (baseline), immediately after TDI or nap (post), and one-week after completing TDI or nap (follow-up). ANOVAs were used to analyze the differences in DSE among our groups. Paired sample t-tests were used to examine changes in our outcome variables between baseline, post, and follow-up. Results At baseline, there were no significant differences in DSE among any groups (p > .05). The control group saw no changes in DSE across any timepoints, but both TDI groups saw significant (p < .05) increases in DSE immediately after TDI (t = -1.85) and at one-week follow-up (t = -3.60). Regarding outcomes, only the TDI-NM group had any significant changes. Specifically, at the follow-up they had significant (p < .05) reductions in thoughts of suicide (t = 2.11), insomnia (t = 1.93), PTSD (t = 2.92), and nightmare distress (t = 3.88). Conclusion Our results support previous research, by demonstrating that TDI can increase DSE. Furthermore, our results suggest that TDI may be able to significantly reduce several negative outcomes variables within individuals experiencing trauma related nightmares, potentially through the intervening variable of DSE. These results justify a further large-scale investigation into the relationship between TDI, DSE, and negative outcomes in a sample that experiences TRNs. Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.1055
Primary Topic
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1056 Targeted Dream Incubation’s Impact on Dream Self-Efficacy, Nightmares, Suicide, PTSD, and Insomnia

Michelle Carr, Guillermo Bernal, Emma Angle, Victoria West Staples et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
article

1056 Targeted Dream Incubation’s Impact on Dream Self-Efficacy, Nightmares, Suicide, PTSD, and Insomnia

Michelle Carr, Guillermo Bernal, Emma Angle, Victoria West Staples, Westley Youngren, Adam Horowitz, Robert Stickgold, Karen Konkoly
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Targeted Dream Incubation (TDI) is the process of giving an individual auditory cues (i.e., “think of a tree”) while they are falling asleep, with the goal of shaping dream content (into something such as a tree). Recent research has demonstrated TDI may be able to increase dream self-efficacy (DSE) and influence other mental health outcomes. Thus, our study explored how TDI impacted DSE, nightmare distress, PTSD, insomnia, and thoughts of suicide in a non-clinical sample and a sample that experiences frequent trauma-related nightmares (TRNs). Methods Our study included N = 30 participants; n = 20 received one 90-minunte session of TDI and n = 10 received one 90-minute nap instead of TDI. Within the TDI condition there were two groups, one group that experienced TRNs (n = 10) and one group that did not (n = 10). All participants completed surveys immediately prior to TDI or nap (baseline), immediately after TDI or nap (post), and one-week after completing TDI or nap (follow-up). ANOVAs were used to analyze the differences in DSE among our groups. Paired sample t-tests were used to examine changes in our outcome variables between baseline, post, and follow-up. Results At baseline, there were no significant differences in DSE among any groups (p > .05). The control group saw no changes in DSE across any timepoints, but both TDI groups saw significant (p < .05) increases in DSE immediately after TDI (t = -1.85) and at one-week follow-up (t = -3.60). Regarding outcomes, only the TDI-NM group had any significant changes. Specifically, at the follow-up they had significant (p < .05) reductions in thoughts of suicide (t = 2.11), insomnia (t = 1.93), PTSD (t = 2.92), and nightmare distress (t = 3.88). Conclusion Our results support previous research, by demonstrating that TDI can increase DSE. Furthermore, our results suggest that TDI may be able to significantly reduce several negative outcomes variables within individuals experiencing trauma related nightmares, potentially through the intervening variable of DSE. These results justify a further large-scale investigation into the relationship between TDI, DSE, and negative outcomes in a sample that experiences TRNs. Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Harvard University (US), State Duma (RU), Brescia University (US), Université de Montréal (CA), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.