Evaluation of image quality between hybrid iterative reconstruction and deep learning reconstruction in low dose abdominopelvic CT in low body mass index individuals

significantly increased across the non-contrast [idose4: 0.09(- 0.4,0.6) vs PI: 0.4(- 0.3, 1), p < 0.001] and portal venous [idose4: 6 (4,7.17) vs PI: 6.47 (4.49, 7.62) p < 0.001] phases. Image noise was significantly lower with PI compared to iDose4 in the non- contrast (iDose4: 7.87 ± 0.97 vs PI: 7.59 ± 0.93, p value = 0.001), arterial (iDose4: 10.4 ± 1.42 vs PI: 9.83 ± 1.29, p < 0.001) and portal venous (idose4: 10.1 (9.6, 11.1) vs PI: 9.4 (8.9, 10.2), p < 0.001) phases. In qualitative analysis, Interobserver agreement between the two radiologists demonstrated good to excellent agreement (ICC range: 0.70-0.96). All the images were graded 3, 4 or 5, indicating good to excellent image quality with no artifacts. DLIR (Precise image-standard) offers a promising approach for improving image quality in low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT scans, particularly in individuals with a low BMI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52554-z
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of image quality between hybrid iterative reconstruction and deep learning reconstruction in low dose abdominopelvic CT in low body mass index individuals

Nitika C. Panakkal, Suresh Sukumar, Jyoti Garg, Shivanath Shanbhag et al.
Scientific Reports
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Evaluation of image quality between hybrid iterative reconstruction and deep learning reconstruction in low dose abdominopelvic CT in low body mass index individuals

Nitika C. Panakkal, Suresh Sukumar, Jyoti Garg, Shivanath Shanbhag, C. Abraham Jacob, Thejas M. Shivakumar, Shailesh Nayak, Rajagopal Kadavigere
article en

Abstract

significantly increased across the non-contrast [idose4: 0.09(- 0.4,0.6) vs PI: 0.4(- 0.3, 1), p < 0.001] and portal venous [idose4: 6 (4,7.17) vs PI: 6.47 (4.49, 7.62) p < 0.001] phases. Image noise was significantly lower with PI compared to iDose4 in the non- contrast (iDose4: 7.87 ± 0.97 vs PI: 7.59 ± 0.93, p value = 0.001), arterial (iDose4: 10.4 ± 1.42 vs PI: 9.83 ± 1.29, p < 0.001) and portal venous (idose4: 10.1 (9.6, 11.1) vs PI: 9.4 (8.9, 10.2), p < 0.001) phases. In qualitative analysis, Interobserver agreement between the two radiologists demonstrated good to excellent agreement (ICC range: 0.70-0.96). All the images were graded 3, 4 or 5, indicating good to excellent image quality with no artifacts. DLIR (Precise image-standard) offers a promising approach for improving image quality in low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT scans, particularly in individuals with a low BMI.

Scientific Reports
Manipal Academy of Higher Education (IN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.