Initial static, pseudo-static, dynamic, and cognitive fit evaluation of three passive shoulder exoskeletons while performing simulated manufacturing tasks

Shoulder disorders have been associated with repetitive overhead work and manual lifting. Passive exoskeletons may reduce exposure to physical risk factors associated with shoulder injuries. This repeated-measures study evaluated the initial static, pseudo-static, cognitive, and dynamic fit of three passive shoulder exoskeletons compared to a no-exoskeleton condition. Twenty-four participants (sex-balanced) performed range of motion tasks, simulated manufacturing activities, and a cognitive performance test. Results indicated that sex did not significantly affect any fit outcomes. Cognitive performance metrics remained unaffected across conditions. Exoskeletons improved certain static range of motion tasks, notably cross-body adduction and external rotation, while hindering others, such as extension. Mixed results were found for mean arm elevation during cognitive, pseudo-static, and dynamic tasks. The findings offer valuable insights into the nuanced trade-offs of passive exoskeletons and highlight the importance of task-specific fit evaluations for broader industrial adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ergonomics
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2026.104809
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Initial static, pseudo-static, dynamic, and cognitive fit evaluation of three passive shoulder exoskeletons while performing simulated manufacturing tasks

Yadrianna Acosta-Sojo, Diana Abbasi, Abby Walden, Mark Schall
Applied Ergonomics
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Initial static, pseudo-static, dynamic, and cognitive fit evaluation of three passive shoulder exoskeletons while performing simulated manufacturing tasks

Yadrianna Acosta-Sojo, Diana Abbasi, Abby Walden, Mark Schall
article en

Abstract

Shoulder disorders have been associated with repetitive overhead work and manual lifting. Passive exoskeletons may reduce exposure to physical risk factors associated with shoulder injuries. This repeated-measures study evaluated the initial static, pseudo-static, cognitive, and dynamic fit of three passive shoulder exoskeletons compared to a no-exoskeleton condition. Twenty-four participants (sex-balanced) performed range of motion tasks, simulated manufacturing activities, and a cognitive performance test. Results indicated that sex did not significantly affect any fit outcomes. Cognitive performance metrics remained unaffected across conditions. Exoskeletons improved certain static range of motion tasks, notably cross-body adduction and external rotation, while hindering others, such as extension. Mixed results were found for mean arm elevation during cognitive, pseudo-static, and dynamic tasks. The findings offer valuable insights into the nuanced trade-offs of passive exoskeletons and highlight the importance of task-specific fit evaluations for broader industrial adoption.

Applied ErgonomicsVol. 137
Auburn University (US)
U.S. Army, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Initial static, pseudo-static, dynamic, and cognitive fit evaluation of three passive shoulder exoskeletons while performing simulated manufacturing tasks — Yadrianna Acosta-Sojo, Diana Abbasi, et al. · Applied Ergonomics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS