1287 Screen Time to Dream Time: A Novel Case of Technology-Associated Parasomnia (TAP)

Abstract Introduction While the negative impacts of technology on sleep architecture are well-documented, parasomnias involving digital devices remain underrecognized. We present the first video-documented case of persistent smartphone use during sleep and propose diagnostic criteria for a novel parasomnia subtype: Technology-Associated Parasomnia (TAP). This case highlights the potential for technology to trigger and perpetuate sleep disturbances through behaviors during sleep. This report also underscores the need for clinical recognition of this increasingly relevant sleep disorder in our technology-saturated society. Report of case(s) A 26-year-old male presented with difficulty falling asleep, non-restorative sleep, nocturnal awakenings, and daytime sleepiness. He reported habitual phone use in bed but denied parasomnia history. Video-polysomnography (v-PSG) revealed prolonged sleep latency, decreased sleep efficiency, and sleep fragmentation. Video showed 225 minutes of awake phone use after lights off and 143 minutes of continued phone holding after sleep onset, including 51.5 minutes with the screen inactive. The patient repositioned the phone and maintained a screen-viewing grasp, even during stage R sleep, exhibiting REM without atonia (RWA). RWA Index was 19.6% with chin EMG and 37.0% with chin and tibialis anterior EMG. These behaviors spanned all sleep stages. The patient had no recollection of these behaviors the following morning. There was no sleep-disordered breathing or periodic limb movements of sleep. Conclusion This case provides objective, video-based evidence of technology-driven behaviors persisting into sleep, contributing to arousals and sleep fragmentation. We propose formal diagnostic criteria for TAP as a distinct parasomnia subtype. This report underscores the importance of recognizing TAP, particularly given the lack of patient recall, which may lead to underdiagnosis and chronic sleep disruption. Further research is needed to fully characterize the clinical implications of TAP and develop effective interventions. Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.1286
Primary Topic
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1287 Screen Time to Dream Time: A Novel Case of Technology-Associated Parasomnia (TAP)

Victoria Cocozza, Nolan Carlile, Jaclyn Faulk, Amanda Radtke et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
article

1287 Screen Time to Dream Time: A Novel Case of Technology-Associated Parasomnia (TAP)

Victoria Cocozza, Nolan Carlile, Jaclyn Faulk, Amanda Radtke, Ryan Matheson, Matthew Brock, H Scheuller, Zahari Tchopev, Alexandra Ables
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction While the negative impacts of technology on sleep architecture are well-documented, parasomnias involving digital devices remain underrecognized. We present the first video-documented case of persistent smartphone use during sleep and propose diagnostic criteria for a novel parasomnia subtype: Technology-Associated Parasomnia (TAP). This case highlights the potential for technology to trigger and perpetuate sleep disturbances through behaviors during sleep. This report also underscores the need for clinical recognition of this increasingly relevant sleep disorder in our technology-saturated society. Report of case(s) A 26-year-old male presented with difficulty falling asleep, non-restorative sleep, nocturnal awakenings, and daytime sleepiness. He reported habitual phone use in bed but denied parasomnia history. Video-polysomnography (v-PSG) revealed prolonged sleep latency, decreased sleep efficiency, and sleep fragmentation. Video showed 225 minutes of awake phone use after lights off and 143 minutes of continued phone holding after sleep onset, including 51.5 minutes with the screen inactive. The patient repositioned the phone and maintained a screen-viewing grasp, even during stage R sleep, exhibiting REM without atonia (RWA). RWA Index was 19.6% with chin EMG and 37.0% with chin and tibialis anterior EMG. These behaviors spanned all sleep stages. The patient had no recollection of these behaviors the following morning. There was no sleep-disordered breathing or periodic limb movements of sleep. Conclusion This case provides objective, video-based evidence of technology-driven behaviors persisting into sleep, contributing to arousals and sleep fragmentation. We propose formal diagnostic criteria for TAP as a distinct parasomnia subtype. This report underscores the importance of recognizing TAP, particularly given the lack of patient recall, which may lead to underdiagnosis and chronic sleep disruption. Further research is needed to fully characterize the clinical implications of TAP and develop effective interventions. Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Wilford Hall Ambulatory Surgical Center (US), San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.