Exploratory Identification of Gene Copy Number Cut-Off for NGS-Based MET Amplification Assessment and Clinical Relevance to MET Inhibitor Outcomes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction: MET amplification is a critical oncogenic driver and a major mechanism of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assays are increasingly used in clinical practice. However, they lack a unified standard for defining MET amplification across multiple NGS platforms with a potential actionable threshold. Methods: This was a multiple-site joint study to optimize the cut-off value for MET amplification using tumor tissue and NGS analysis. In the training cohort, five NGS panels were used to detect MET gene copy number (GCN), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used as a reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the optimal cutoff with 100% specificity and 66.7% sensitivity. The results were validated in an independent cohort to explore the correlation between MET amplification and efficacy of MET inhibitors in patients with NSCLC. Results: In the training cohort (n=21), the optimal MET GCN cut-off was determined to be 6.55, yielding an area under the curve of 0.9, corresponding to an accuracy of 85.7%. MET polysomy, identified using FISH (n=2), was also detected using NGS. All five NGS panels demonstrated good concordance with FISH, with accuracies ranging from 75.0% to 85.7%. In the validation cohort (n=29), NGS analysis demonstrated a good performance, with an accuracy rate of 79.3%. Patients with MET GCN ≥ 6.55 had a significantly longer median progression free survival than those with MET GCN < 6.55 (hazard ratio = 0.42; p = 0.03). Conclusion: In this study, an exploratory cut-off of 6.55 for MET GCN by NGS was associated with MET amplification and longer progression-free survival in patients receiving targeted therapy. However, given the retrospective design and limited sample size, these findings should be regarded as exploratory and require validation in larger, prospective cohorts before broader clinical application. Keywords: MET amplification, next-generation of sequencing, gene copy number, non-small-cell lung cancer, targeted therapy

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lung Cancer Targets and Therapy
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/lctt.s596080
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploratory Identification of Gene Copy Number Cut-Off for NGS-Based MET Amplification Assessment and Clinical Relevance to MET Inhibitor Outcomes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

S X Liu, Guang‐Ling Jie, Xie Zhi, Qingling Zhang et al.
Lung Cancer Targets and Therapy
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
article

Exploratory Identification of Gene Copy Number Cut-Off for NGS-Based MET Amplification Assessment and Clinical Relevance to MET Inhibitor Outcomes in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

S X Liu, Guang‐Ling Jie, Xie Zhi, Qingling Zhang, Jia‐Yi Deng, Lixu Yan, Q Zhou, Jin Wang, Wen-Zhao Zhong, Hao Meng, Yang Shao, Yi-Long Wu, Hua-Jun Chen, Zhou Zhang, Xu-Chao Zhang, Yan Zhang, Zhan Huang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: MET amplification is a critical oncogenic driver and a major mechanism of acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based assays are increasingly used in clinical practice. However, they lack a unified standard for defining MET amplification across multiple NGS platforms with a potential actionable threshold. Methods: This was a multiple-site joint study to optimize the cut-off value for MET amplification using tumor tissue and NGS analysis. In the training cohort, five NGS panels were used to detect MET gene copy number (GCN), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was used as a reference. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the optimal cutoff with 100% specificity and 66.7% sensitivity. The results were validated in an independent cohort to explore the correlation between MET amplification and efficacy of MET inhibitors in patients with NSCLC. Results: In the training cohort (n=21), the optimal MET GCN cut-off was determined to be 6.55, yielding an area under the curve of 0.9, corresponding to an accuracy of 85.7%. MET polysomy, identified using FISH (n=2), was also detected using NGS. All five NGS panels demonstrated good concordance with FISH, with accuracies ranging from 75.0% to 85.7%. In the validation cohort (n=29), NGS analysis demonstrated a good performance, with an accuracy rate of 79.3%. Patients with MET GCN ≥ 6.55 had a significantly longer median progression free survival than those with MET GCN < 6.55 (hazard ratio = 0.42; p = 0.03). Conclusion: In this study, an exploratory cut-off of 6.55 for MET GCN by NGS was associated with MET amplification and longer progression-free survival in patients receiving targeted therapy. However, given the retrospective design and limited sample size, these findings should be regarded as exploratory and require validation in larger, prospective cohorts before broader clinical application. Keywords: MET amplification, next-generation of sequencing, gene copy number, non-small-cell lung cancer, targeted therapy

Lung Cancer Targets and TherapyVol. Volume 17
Beijing Institute of Big Data Research (CN), Burning Rock Biotech (China) (CN), Berry Oncology (China) (CN), Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences (CN), Dian Diagnostics (China) (CN), Genesee Community College (US)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.