“Showing the data” in published biology research
Showing the data is the first rule of effective figures, yet this mandate is often ignored. Perhaps the signature offender is the "dynamite plot"-a bar graph showing mean and error. Here, we evaluate recent trends in the use of dynamite plots by analyzing 8,834 figures from 2,930 studies published between 2021 and 2025 in 18 journals from five fields of biology. We find that dynamite plots constitute ~25% of figures and are especially common in microbiology journals. However, the use of dynamite plots has declined substantially across fields and journals from 30% of figures in 2021 to 18% in 2025-evidence that biologists increasingly show the data in their figures. We advocate for authors, reviewers, and editors to continue this trend, suggest simple dot plots as an effective replacement for dynamite plots, and describe other options when space or sample size makes dot plots less feasible.
Authors
- Benjamin G. Freeman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6131-6832)
- Akul Chopra
- Taylor L Cooper (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7735-6545)
- Miharu Yasumuro
- Xinyu Zhang
- Sidharth Srinivasan
- Soobin An
- Marina E. Haldopoulos
- Aiswarya Venkata Suresh Kumar
- Melody Modarressi
Institutions
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering (US)
- Quantitative BioSciences (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- mBio
- Published
- 2026-05-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00572-26
- Primary Topic
- Academic Writing and Publishing
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00