“Showing the data” in published biology research

Showing the data is the first rule of effective figures, yet this mandate is often ignored. Perhaps the signature offender is the "dynamite plot"-a bar graph showing mean and error. Here, we evaluate recent trends in the use of dynamite plots by analyzing 8,834 figures from 2,930 studies published between 2021 and 2025 in 18 journals from five fields of biology. We find that dynamite plots constitute ~25% of figures and are especially common in microbiology journals. However, the use of dynamite plots has declined substantially across fields and journals from 30% of figures in 2021 to 18% in 2025-evidence that biologists increasingly show the data in their figures. We advocate for authors, reviewers, and editors to continue this trend, suggest simple dot plots as an effective replacement for dynamite plots, and describe other options when space or sample size makes dot plots less feasible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
mBio
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00572-26
Primary Topic
Academic Writing and Publishing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Showing the data” in published biology research

Benjamin G. Freeman, Akul Chopra, Taylor L Cooper, Miharu Yasumuro et al.
mBio
Academic Writing and Publishing
article

“Showing the data” in published biology research

Benjamin G. Freeman, Akul Chopra, Taylor L Cooper, Miharu Yasumuro, Xinyu Zhang, Sidharth Srinivasan, Soobin An, Marina E. Haldopoulos, Aiswarya Venkata Suresh Kumar, Melody Modarressi
article en

Abstract

Showing the data is the first rule of effective figures, yet this mandate is often ignored. Perhaps the signature offender is the "dynamite plot"-a bar graph showing mean and error. Here, we evaluate recent trends in the use of dynamite plots by analyzing 8,834 figures from 2,930 studies published between 2021 and 2025 in 18 journals from five fields of biology. We find that dynamite plots constitute ~25% of figures and are especially common in microbiology journals. However, the use of dynamite plots has declined substantially across fields and journals from 30% of figures in 2021 to 18% in 2025-evidence that biologists increasingly show the data in their figures. We advocate for authors, reviewers, and editors to continue this trend, suggest simple dot plots as an effective replacement for dynamite plots, and describe other options when space or sample size makes dot plots less feasible.

mBio
Georgia Institute of Technology (US), The Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering (US), Quantitative BioSciences (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Academic Writing and Publishing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.