1004 Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulator, Beyond Good Night Sleep

Abstract Introduction Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulator (TPNS) is effective therapy for central sleep apnea (CSA) in patient with cardiovascular disease. However, its impact on obstructive sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation remain unclear. Methods Objective is to describe our six-year experience using TPNS for CSA in patient with cardiovascular disease and evaluate its effects on OSA and atrial fibrillation. We performed a multi-institutional prospective cohort study of patients with moderate to severe CSA who underwent TPNS implantation from August 2019 to the present. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were collected prospectively. Polysomnography (PSG) results prior to implantation were compared with PSG post-optimization studies, and AF presence 6 month before and 6 month after TPNS optimization was assessed. Results A total of 38 devices were successfully implanted. Two patients (5%) experienced lead dislodgment requiring re-implantation; no other peri-procedural complications occurred. The cohort’s mean age was 68.69 ± 10.42 years, with a mean CHADS-VASc score of 2 ± 1.86. Sixteen of the 38 patients underwent optimization with polysomnography (PSG). Significant improvements were observed in: Apnea–Hypopnea Index (AHI): 43.4 ± 25.1 pre-treatment vs 21.2 ± 15.49 post-treatment (p = 0.03) Central sleep apnea events: 106.6 ± 75.07 pre vs 17.71 ± 17.93 post (p < 0.01) Mixed sleep apnea events: 25.06 ± 47.29 pre vs 1.67 ± 3.11 post (p = 0.05) Obstructive sleep apnea events: 9 ± 10 pre vs 23.5 ± 31.97 post (p = 0.03) Atrial fibrillation was present in 6 of 17 patients pre-treatment compared with 3 of 17 post-treatment (p = 0.03). Five of the six patients with atrial fibrillation had cardiac implantable electronic devices. The total average atrial fibrillation burden in these five patients was 100% before therapy and decreased to 66% after therapy (p = 0.08) Conclusion TPNS provides effective therapy for central, mixed sleep apnea, and marked improvements in AHI. Although obstructive sleep apnea events increased, atrial fibrillation burden improved following TPNS therapy. Further research is warranted, and careful patient selection remains critical Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.1003
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1004 Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulator, Beyond Good Night Sleep

Miguel Valderrábano, Jon Na, Paul Schurmann
SLEEP
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

1004 Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulator, Beyond Good Night Sleep

Miguel Valderrábano, Jon Na, Paul Schurmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulator (TPNS) is effective therapy for central sleep apnea (CSA) in patient with cardiovascular disease. However, its impact on obstructive sleep apnea and atrial fibrillation remain unclear. Methods Objective is to describe our six-year experience using TPNS for CSA in patient with cardiovascular disease and evaluate its effects on OSA and atrial fibrillation. We performed a multi-institutional prospective cohort study of patients with moderate to severe CSA who underwent TPNS implantation from August 2019 to the present. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were collected prospectively. Polysomnography (PSG) results prior to implantation were compared with PSG post-optimization studies, and AF presence 6 month before and 6 month after TPNS optimization was assessed. Results A total of 38 devices were successfully implanted. Two patients (5%) experienced lead dislodgment requiring re-implantation; no other peri-procedural complications occurred. The cohort’s mean age was 68.69 ± 10.42 years, with a mean CHADS-VASc score of 2 ± 1.86. Sixteen of the 38 patients underwent optimization with polysomnography (PSG). Significant improvements were observed in: Apnea–Hypopnea Index (AHI): 43.4 ± 25.1 pre-treatment vs 21.2 ± 15.49 post-treatment (p = 0.03) Central sleep apnea events: 106.6 ± 75.07 pre vs 17.71 ± 17.93 post (p < 0.01) Mixed sleep apnea events: 25.06 ± 47.29 pre vs 1.67 ± 3.11 post (p = 0.05) Obstructive sleep apnea events: 9 ± 10 pre vs 23.5 ± 31.97 post (p = 0.03) Atrial fibrillation was present in 6 of 17 patients pre-treatment compared with 3 of 17 post-treatment (p = 0.03). Five of the six patients with atrial fibrillation had cardiac implantable electronic devices. The total average atrial fibrillation burden in these five patients was 100% before therapy and decreased to 66% after therapy (p = 0.08) Conclusion TPNS provides effective therapy for central, mixed sleep apnea, and marked improvements in AHI. Although obstructive sleep apnea events increased, atrial fibrillation burden improved following TPNS therapy. Further research is warranted, and careful patient selection remains critical Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Methodist Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.