Shale Cap Breakthrough Pressure Prediction Method Based on Machine Learning

Breakthrough pressure (BP) is a key parameter for evaluating the sealing capacity of shale caprocks, whereas direct laboratory measurements are time-consuming and costly, limiting their use in continuous regional assessment. This study develops a conventional-log-based workflow for BP prediction in the Quan-4 Member (K1q4) caprock underlying the Qingshankou shale oil interval in the Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin. Four routinely available logs—gamma ray (GR), acoustic interval transit time (AC), bulk density (DEN), and compensated neutron log (CNL)—were integrated with core-measured BP data. A GR-AC multiple-regression baseline and five machine-learning algorithms, including stochastic gradient descent (SGD), extremely randomized trees (ERT), Random Forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), were compared under a unified workflow. The training set was used for normalization, model fitting, grid search, and internal five-fold cross-validation, whereas the held-out test set and external prediction wells were kept separate for performance evaluation. The results show that BP generally increases with GR and DEN and decreases with AC and CNL, indicating that clay content, compaction, and pore connectivity jointly control the logging response of caprock sealing capacity. Among the evaluated models, AdaBoost achieved the best overall performance, with RMSE, MAE, and R2 values of 1.33 MPa, 0.97 MPa, and 0.89 on the held-out test set, and 1.19 MPa, 0.92 MPa, and 0.94 in external prediction wells. Train–test diagnostics, learning curves, and SHAP analysis indicate stable performance and physically plausible feature contributions within the present dataset. The proposed workflow can therefore provide a practical supplement to laboratory BP measurements for caprock evaluation in the study area, although broader application still requires well-level independent validation and explicit prediction-uncertainty quantification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104675
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shale Cap Breakthrough Pressure Prediction Method Based on Machine Learning

Zongli Liu, Huanping Wu, Meiling Zhang, Zheng Wu
Applied Sciences
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Shale Cap Breakthrough Pressure Prediction Method Based on Machine Learning

Zongli Liu, Huanping Wu, Meiling Zhang, Zheng Wu
article en

Abstract

Breakthrough pressure (BP) is a key parameter for evaluating the sealing capacity of shale caprocks, whereas direct laboratory measurements are time-consuming and costly, limiting their use in continuous regional assessment. This study develops a conventional-log-based workflow for BP prediction in the Quan-4 Member (K1q4) caprock underlying the Qingshankou shale oil interval in the Gulong Sag, Songliao Basin. Four routinely available logs—gamma ray (GR), acoustic interval transit time (AC), bulk density (DEN), and compensated neutron log (CNL)—were integrated with core-measured BP data. A GR-AC multiple-regression baseline and five machine-learning algorithms, including stochastic gradient descent (SGD), extremely randomized trees (ERT), Random Forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), were compared under a unified workflow. The training set was used for normalization, model fitting, grid search, and internal five-fold cross-validation, whereas the held-out test set and external prediction wells were kept separate for performance evaluation. The results show that BP generally increases with GR and DEN and decreases with AC and CNL, indicating that clay content, compaction, and pore connectivity jointly control the logging response of caprock sealing capacity. Among the evaluated models, AdaBoost achieved the best overall performance, with RMSE, MAE, and R2 values of 1.33 MPa, 0.97 MPa, and 0.89 on the held-out test set, and 1.19 MPa, 0.92 MPa, and 0.94 in external prediction wells. Train–test diagnostics, learning curves, and SHAP analysis indicate stable performance and physically plausible feature contributions within the present dataset. The proposed workflow can therefore provide a practical supplement to laboratory BP measurements for caprock evaluation in the study area, although broader application still requires well-level independent validation and explicit prediction-uncertainty quantification.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(10)
Northeast Petroleum University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Northeast Petroleum University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.