A Study on an Aesthetic Judgment Model for Generative AI-Based Fashion Design - Focusing on Brand Identity-Centered Decision Making -

This study examines choice overload and decision-making uncertainty among fashion designers working within generative AI environments and proposes a structured aesthetic judgment model to guide evaluative decision-making. While generative AI has significantly reduced the time and cost required to generate design forms, it has also shifted the designer's role from that of a primary creator to that of a critical evaluator responsible for selecting viable design alternatives from a rapidly expanding set of options. However, existing research on human-AI interaction and collaboration has largely focused on operational efficiency and generative performance, leaving the evaluative criteria, judgment processes, and decision-making logics that guide design selection under explored. To address this gap, this study repositions brand identity not merely as a post hoc management concept, but as a cognitive and aesthetic framework that enables designers to systematically structure selection processes before final design decisions are made. From this perspective, the study proposes a three-stage aesthetic judgment model centered on brand identity. The model comprises (a) cognitive homology alignment, which narrows the decision space by excluding alternatives that conflict with the brand's historically accumulated formal aesthetics; (b) contextual semiotic reconstruction, which interprets design alternatives in relation to the brand's narrative, cultural codes, and symbolic associations; and (c) axiological final validation, which determines whether a design can be formally endorsed as a legitimate expression of the brand’s core values. As a conceptual study grounded in an integrative literature review, this research contributes to the scholarly literature by redefining professional expertise in generative AI-driven fashion design. Specifically, it shifts the focus from the mere production of design outputs to the justification and articulation of aesthetic and brand-centered design decisions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Korean Society of Costume
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7233/jksc.2026.76.2.051
Primary Topic
Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Study on an Aesthetic Judgment Model for Generative AI-Based Fashion Design - Focusing on Brand Identity-Centered Decision Making -

Yeonyi Jung
The Korean Society of Costume
Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research
article

A Study on an Aesthetic Judgment Model for Generative AI-Based Fashion Design - Focusing on Brand Identity-Centered Decision Making -

Yeonyi Jung
article en

Abstract

This study examines choice overload and decision-making uncertainty among fashion designers working within generative AI environments and proposes a structured aesthetic judgment model to guide evaluative decision-making. While generative AI has significantly reduced the time and cost required to generate design forms, it has also shifted the designer's role from that of a primary creator to that of a critical evaluator responsible for selecting viable design alternatives from a rapidly expanding set of options. However, existing research on human-AI interaction and collaboration has largely focused on operational efficiency and generative performance, leaving the evaluative criteria, judgment processes, and decision-making logics that guide design selection under explored. To address this gap, this study repositions brand identity not merely as a post hoc management concept, but as a cognitive and aesthetic framework that enables designers to systematically structure selection processes before final design decisions are made. From this perspective, the study proposes a three-stage aesthetic judgment model centered on brand identity. The model comprises (a) cognitive homology alignment, which narrows the decision space by excluding alternatives that conflict with the brand's historically accumulated formal aesthetics; (b) contextual semiotic reconstruction, which interprets design alternatives in relation to the brand's narrative, cultural codes, and symbolic associations; and (c) axiological final validation, which determines whether a design can be formally endorsed as a legitimate expression of the brand’s core values. As a conceptual study grounded in an integrative literature review, this research contributes to the scholarly literature by redefining professional expertise in generative AI-driven fashion design. Specifically, it shifts the focus from the mere production of design outputs to the justification and articulation of aesthetic and brand-centered design decisions.

The Korean Society of CostumeVol. 76(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Diverse Topics in Contemporary Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Study on an Aesthetic Judgment Model for Generative AI-Based Fashion Design - Focusing on Brand Identity-Centered Decision Making - — Yeonyi Jung · The Korean Society of Costume (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS