0587 Under-Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea at the US / Mexico Border – Data from the Nogales Cardiometabolic Health and Sleep Study

Abstract Introduction Sleep apnea is both underdiagnosed and undertreated in the US. Few studies have examined the gaps in border communities where access to specialized sleep care may be limited. This study quantifies the rates of underdiagnosis and identified other risk factors in a cohort at the US-Mexico Border. Methods Data were collected from 992 working-age adults (age 25-60) living at the US-Mexico Border. Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was determined from Embletta home sleep tests scored by certified polysomnographic technicians using the 3% hypopnea rule. Results were classified as None (0.0-4.9), Minimal (5.0-9.9), Mild (10.0-14.9), Moderate (15.0-29.9), and Severe (30+). Actual diagnosis of sleep apnea was assessed in a detailed medical history interview. Cross-tabs and Receiver-Operator Curves (ROCs) were computed, with post-hoc McNemar’s test to evaluate systematic under-diagnosis at each diagnostic cutoff. Logistic regression analysis examined sociodemographic correlates. Future analyses will incorporate symptom reports to ascertain diagnoses for AHI< 15. Results Prevalence of sleep apnea categories in the sample was None=61.51%, Minimal=21.35% Mild=7.36%, Moderate=5.57%, and Severe=4.21%. Based on an AHI cutoff of 5.0, 22 of 406 cases were diagnosed, representing 94.6% under-diagnosis, 5.4% sensitivity but 98.5% specificity, and ROC of 0.52. McNemar’s test was significant (X2 = 357.82, p< 0.0001), indicating under-diagnosis. Based on an AHI cutoff of 10, 12/161 cases were diagnosed, representing 92.5% under-diagnosis, 7.5% sensitivity but 97.7% specificity, and ROC of 0.53. McNemar’s test was significant (X2 = 102.76, p< 0.0001). Based on an AHI cutoff of 15, 7/93 cases were diagnosed, representing 92.5% under-diagnosis, 7.5% sensitivity but 97.3% specificity, and ROC of 0.52. McNemar’s test was significant (X2 = 36.41, p< 0.0001). Being underdiagnosed according to the AHI>=5 criterion was associated with higher Mexican acculturation (OR=2.31/pt) and negatively related to higher BMI (OR=0.92/pt). Conclusion Sleep apnea is highly under-diagnosed in this US-Mexico border sample, with 90-95% of cases currently under-diagnosed, thus exceeding national estimates of under-diagnosis. The study highlights the urgent need to increase case-finding efforts and awareness, especially among Mexican acculturation and less severe BMI. Support (if any) R01MD011600, R01MH135978

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0586
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0587 Under-Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea at the US / Mexico Border – Data from the Nogales Cardiometabolic Health and Sleep Study

Patricia Haynes, Sairam Parthasarathy, John Ruiz, Dorothy Tung et al.
SLEEP
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

0587 Under-Diagnosis of Sleep Apnea at the US / Mexico Border – Data from the Nogales Cardiometabolic Health and Sleep Study

Patricia Haynes, Sairam Parthasarathy, John Ruiz, Dorothy Tung, Velarie Ansu, WD Killgore, Michael Amadei, Suzanne Gorovoy, Girardin Jean-Louis, Andrea Diaz-Pacheco, Orfeu Buxton, Patricia Molina, Michael Grandner, Sanjay Patel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Sleep apnea is both underdiagnosed and undertreated in the US. Few studies have examined the gaps in border communities where access to specialized sleep care may be limited. This study quantifies the rates of underdiagnosis and identified other risk factors in a cohort at the US-Mexico Border. Methods Data were collected from 992 working-age adults (age 25-60) living at the US-Mexico Border. Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) was determined from Embletta home sleep tests scored by certified polysomnographic technicians using the 3% hypopnea rule. Results were classified as None (0.0-4.9), Minimal (5.0-9.9), Mild (10.0-14.9), Moderate (15.0-29.9), and Severe (30+). Actual diagnosis of sleep apnea was assessed in a detailed medical history interview. Cross-tabs and Receiver-Operator Curves (ROCs) were computed, with post-hoc McNemar’s test to evaluate systematic under-diagnosis at each diagnostic cutoff. Logistic regression analysis examined sociodemographic correlates. Future analyses will incorporate symptom reports to ascertain diagnoses for AHI< 15. Results Prevalence of sleep apnea categories in the sample was None=61.51%, Minimal=21.35% Mild=7.36%, Moderate=5.57%, and Severe=4.21%. Based on an AHI cutoff of 5.0, 22 of 406 cases were diagnosed, representing 94.6% under-diagnosis, 5.4% sensitivity but 98.5% specificity, and ROC of 0.52. McNemar’s test was significant (X2 = 357.82, p< 0.0001), indicating under-diagnosis. Based on an AHI cutoff of 10, 12/161 cases were diagnosed, representing 92.5% under-diagnosis, 7.5% sensitivity but 97.7% specificity, and ROC of 0.53. McNemar’s test was significant (X2 = 102.76, p< 0.0001). Based on an AHI cutoff of 15, 7/93 cases were diagnosed, representing 92.5% under-diagnosis, 7.5% sensitivity but 97.3% specificity, and ROC of 0.52. McNemar’s test was significant (X2 = 36.41, p< 0.0001). Being underdiagnosed according to the AHI>=5 criterion was associated with higher Mexican acculturation (OR=2.31/pt) and negatively related to higher BMI (OR=0.92/pt). Conclusion Sleep apnea is highly under-diagnosed in this US-Mexico border sample, with 90-95% of cases currently under-diagnosed, thus exceeding national estimates of under-diagnosis. The study highlights the urgent need to increase case-finding efforts and awareness, especially among Mexican acculturation and less severe BMI. Support (if any) R01MD011600, R01MH135978

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Miami (US), Pulmonary and Allergy Associates (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.