1213 Home vs. Lab Polysomnography with a Patch-Based System: Longer, More Efficient Sleep at Home Without Respiratory Trade-Offs

Abstract Introduction Polysomnography (PSG) performed in sleep laboratories is the diagnostic gold standard, but laboratory schedules, unfamiliar surroundings, and equipment burden may distort natural sleep. Home PSG systems could capture more representative sleep while preserving full signal fidelity. The Onera Sleep Test System (STS) is a patient applied, patch-based, type II PSG system, which enables studies to be performed unattended at the patient’s home. Sleep timing, architecture, respiratory indices and the patients’ experience using the patch-based device were compared in the home and laboratory environments. Methods In a two-phase, multicenter study across seven German sleep clinics, adults referred for PSG first underwent in-lab patch-based PSG (N=344) and eligible participants then completed a home PSG within one week (N=204). A subset of studies (N=52) had a full lab and home sleep night for a comparison of sleep and respiratory metrics Results Differences in sleep patterns were found between the two environments (lights-off 23:00 home vs 22:10 lab; lights-on 06:33 home vs 05:33 lab). In the scored subset, home nights showed longer total sleep time (409.5 ± 74.5 vs 378.2 ± 71.8 min, p=0.033), more REM sleep (91.1 ± 28.1 vs 76.7 ± 28.4 min, p=0.024) and more REM cycles (5.04 ± 1.76 vs 4.33 ± 1.70, p=0.049), higher sleep efficiency (88.9% ± 9.0 vs 80.9% ± 11.9, p< 0.001), lower WASO (24.3 ± 24.1 vs 54.8 ± 45.1 min, p< 0.001), shorter REM onset latency (85.5 ± 47.7 vs 108.2 ± 64.7 min, p=0.008), and a lower arousal index (1.86 ± 1.64 vs 2.89 ± 2.11, p=0.003). Respiratory metrics and body position did not differ significantly between settings. 73% of subjects indicated that their sleep in the lab was “worse than home”. Device feedback was favorable: 84% judged size “just right,” 6% reported any concerns, 67% reported no issues at home, and 92% felt confident placing the device. Conclusion These findings support home PSG to obtain more representative sleep architecture without compromising detection of sleep-disordered breathing. Support (if any) The study was funded by Onera Health and managed by the CRO Maxis Medical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.1212
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1213 Home vs. Lab Polysomnography with a Patch-Based System: Longer, More Efficient Sleep at Home Without Respiratory Trade-Offs

Christian Viniol, Holger Woehrle, Georg Nilius, W Randerath et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

1213 Home vs. Lab Polysomnography with a Patch-Based System: Longer, More Efficient Sleep at Home Without Respiratory Trade-Offs

Christian Viniol, Holger Woehrle, Georg Nilius, W Randerath, Christoph Schobel, Hartmut Schnieder, Wolfgang Galetke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Polysomnography (PSG) performed in sleep laboratories is the diagnostic gold standard, but laboratory schedules, unfamiliar surroundings, and equipment burden may distort natural sleep. Home PSG systems could capture more representative sleep while preserving full signal fidelity. The Onera Sleep Test System (STS) is a patient applied, patch-based, type II PSG system, which enables studies to be performed unattended at the patient’s home. Sleep timing, architecture, respiratory indices and the patients’ experience using the patch-based device were compared in the home and laboratory environments. Methods In a two-phase, multicenter study across seven German sleep clinics, adults referred for PSG first underwent in-lab patch-based PSG (N=344) and eligible participants then completed a home PSG within one week (N=204). A subset of studies (N=52) had a full lab and home sleep night for a comparison of sleep and respiratory metrics Results Differences in sleep patterns were found between the two environments (lights-off 23:00 home vs 22:10 lab; lights-on 06:33 home vs 05:33 lab). In the scored subset, home nights showed longer total sleep time (409.5 ± 74.5 vs 378.2 ± 71.8 min, p=0.033), more REM sleep (91.1 ± 28.1 vs 76.7 ± 28.4 min, p=0.024) and more REM cycles (5.04 ± 1.76 vs 4.33 ± 1.70, p=0.049), higher sleep efficiency (88.9% ± 9.0 vs 80.9% ± 11.9, p< 0.001), lower WASO (24.3 ± 24.1 vs 54.8 ± 45.1 min, p< 0.001), shorter REM onset latency (85.5 ± 47.7 vs 108.2 ± 64.7 min, p=0.008), and a lower arousal index (1.86 ± 1.64 vs 2.89 ± 2.11, p=0.003). Respiratory metrics and body position did not differ significantly between settings. 73% of subjects indicated that their sleep in the lab was “worse than home”. Device feedback was favorable: 84% judged size “just right,” 6% reported any concerns, 67% reported no issues at home, and 92% felt confident placing the device. Conclusion These findings support home PSG to obtain more representative sleep architecture without compromising detection of sleep-disordered breathing. Support (if any) The study was funded by Onera Health and managed by the CRO Maxis Medical.

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), American Academy of Sleep Medicine (US), Ruhrlandklinik (DE), Helios Klinik Hagen Ambrock (DE), Krankenhaus Bethanien (DE), Kliniken Essen-Mitte (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.