1257 Persistent Reduction in REM Sleep Following the Spring Daylight Saving Time Transition in a Large Real-World Cohort

Abstract Introduction The spring transition into Daylight Saving Time (DST) introduces an abrupt one-hour shift that may disrupt sleep beyond the first night. It remains unclear how sleep architecture changes during the weeks before and after this transition. Methods We examined 117,578 U.S. adult users (~2.67 million nights; 39.5% female; mean age=47±12.8 years) of a commercially available under-mattress device (Sleeptracker-AI Monitor, Fullpower Technologies Inc., California, USA). Sleep architecture data was gathered from two weeks prior to DST (2/22/25) to one week after (3/21/25), labeled weeks -2, -1, 0 (week of DST), and 1. To understand DST’s immediate impact, we compared sleep parameters on the Sunday DST began to the two previous Sundays using Welch’s t-tests. Next, after excluding weekends, we computed each participant’s mean weekly metrics for weeks -2 through +1 and compared them using Welch’s t-tests. Results In comparison to the previous two Sundays, the first night of DST exhibited shorter total sleep time (TST) (week 0 vs. -2: -13.7 min; week 0 vs. -1: -12.9 min) and lower REM% (week 0 vs. -2: -0.11%; week 0 vs. -1: -0.14%; p< 0.001 for all comparisons). However, TST returned close to pre-DST levels during week 0, remaining only slightly lower than in weeks -2 (week 0 vs. -2: -0.63 min) and -1 (week 0 vs. -1: -1.1 min; p< 0.01 for both comparisons). By week +1, TST no longer differed from weeks -2 or -1 (p>0.05). In contrast, REM% remained lower in both weeks 0 (week 0 vs. -2: -0.18%; week 0 vs. -1: -0.24%) and +1 (week +1 vs. -2: -0.06%; week +1 vs. -1: -0.12%) relative to pre-DST levels (p< 0.0001 for all comparisons). We didn't observe as significant changes in weekday deep sleep proportion following DST. Conclusion In a large real-world sample, we found that although both REM% and total sleep time (TST) decreased on the first night of DST, only TST returned to pre-DST levels in the subsequent weeks, whereas the reduction in REM% persisted. These findings may help explain ongoing sleep complaints following spring DST and underscore the value of at-home sleep technologies for understanding real-world sleep patterns. Support (if any) Fullpower Technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.1256
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1257 Persistent Reduction in REM Sleep Following the Spring Daylight Saving Time Transition in a Large Real-World Cohort

Venkat Easwar, Arthur Kinsolving, Susan Baron, Philippe Kahn et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

1257 Persistent Reduction in REM Sleep Following the Spring Daylight Saving Time Transition in a Large Real-World Cohort

Venkat Easwar, Arthur Kinsolving, Susan Baron, Philippe Kahn, Rafael Branco, Jennifer Zitser, Sasha Milton, Andrew Cotton-Clay, Laura Fava, Clete Kushida, Yue Leng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The spring transition into Daylight Saving Time (DST) introduces an abrupt one-hour shift that may disrupt sleep beyond the first night. It remains unclear how sleep architecture changes during the weeks before and after this transition. Methods We examined 117,578 U.S. adult users (~2.67 million nights; 39.5% female; mean age=47±12.8 years) of a commercially available under-mattress device (Sleeptracker-AI Monitor, Fullpower Technologies Inc., California, USA). Sleep architecture data was gathered from two weeks prior to DST (2/22/25) to one week after (3/21/25), labeled weeks -2, -1, 0 (week of DST), and 1. To understand DST’s immediate impact, we compared sleep parameters on the Sunday DST began to the two previous Sundays using Welch’s t-tests. Next, after excluding weekends, we computed each participant’s mean weekly metrics for weeks -2 through +1 and compared them using Welch’s t-tests. Results In comparison to the previous two Sundays, the first night of DST exhibited shorter total sleep time (TST) (week 0 vs. -2: -13.7 min; week 0 vs. -1: -12.9 min) and lower REM% (week 0 vs. -2: -0.11%; week 0 vs. -1: -0.14%; p< 0.001 for all comparisons). However, TST returned close to pre-DST levels during week 0, remaining only slightly lower than in weeks -2 (week 0 vs. -2: -0.63 min) and -1 (week 0 vs. -1: -1.1 min; p< 0.01 for both comparisons). By week +1, TST no longer differed from weeks -2 or -1 (p>0.05). In contrast, REM% remained lower in both weeks 0 (week 0 vs. -2: -0.18%; week 0 vs. -1: -0.24%) and +1 (week +1 vs. -2: -0.06%; week +1 vs. -1: -0.12%) relative to pre-DST levels (p< 0.0001 for all comparisons). We didn't observe as significant changes in weekday deep sleep proportion following DST. Conclusion In a large real-world sample, we found that although both REM% and total sleep time (TST) decreased on the first night of DST, only TST returned to pre-DST levels in the subsequent weeks, whereas the reduction in REM% persisted. These findings may help explain ongoing sleep complaints following spring DST and underscore the value of at-home sleep technologies for understanding real-world sleep patterns. Support (if any) Fullpower Technologies.

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.