0702 Symptom Burden and Quality of Life in Patients with Narcolepsy Who Experience Residual Cataplexy: Subgroup Analysis from the CRESCENDO Survey

Abstract Introduction Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1; narcolepsy with cataplexy) is a chronic disease which often requires multiple treatments to address its symptoms. Although cataplexy is a core symptom of narcolepsy, it often goes underrecognized and can cause limitations to daily life. The CRESCENDO survey evaluated the experience of treated patients with NT1. Here we conducted a subgroup analysis of respondents reporting residual cataplexy to better understand the burden and impact on quality of life (QoL). Methods CRESCENDO was developed in partnership with the Narcolepsy Network, conducted (October–December 2023) by a third-party research firm, and included adults diagnosed with NT1 currently taking FDA-approved narcolepsy medication. Results Patients reporting residual cataplexy (n=156; 76.8%) were older (median age 42.0 vs 38.0 yrs) and more likely to identify as White (76.3% vs 51.1%) and female (70.5% vs 42.6%), compared with those reporting no residual cataplexy (n=47). Polypharmacy was more common in the residual cataplexy group (65.4%) compared with the no residual cataplexy group (44.7%). The residual cataplexy group was more likely to be currently treated with antidepressants (42.9 % vs 23.4%) and less likely to be currently treated with oxybates (42.3% vs 61.7%). Patients with residual cataplexy reported greater subjective cognitive impairment (mean BC-CCI score 9.1 vs 5.2), depressive symptoms (mean PHQ-8 score 10.5 vs 7.0), and EDS (mean ESS score 13.6 vs 8.9). Patients with residual cataplexy also reported greater burden related to cognitive (any difficulty with work/school [92.9% vs 83.0%], family/friends relationship [80.8% vs 61.7%], or social activity enjoyment [88.5% vs 66.0%]) and depressive (48.7% vs 34.0% reporting very/extreme difficulty with work/home/social life) symptoms. Other residual symptoms were more frequently self-reported in the residual cataplexy group (EDS, 94.9% vs 78.7%; brain fog 87.2% vs 44.7%; depression 50.0% vs 29.8%). Conclusion Despite current treatment, residual cataplexy was common among patients with NT1, affecting a majority of NT1 patient survey respondents. These patients reported a substantial symptom burden and reduced QoL. There is prevailing unmet need for additional treatment options to treat cataplexy and improve outcomes in this population. Support (if any) Axsome Therapeutics Inc.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0701
Primary Topic
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0702 Symptom Burden and Quality of Life in Patients with Narcolepsy Who Experience Residual Cataplexy: Subgroup Analysis from the CRESCENDO Survey

Herriot Tabuteau, Samantha Floam, Michael Thorpy, Graham Eglit
SLEEP
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
article

0702 Symptom Burden and Quality of Life in Patients with Narcolepsy Who Experience Residual Cataplexy: Subgroup Analysis from the CRESCENDO Survey

Herriot Tabuteau, Samantha Floam, Michael Thorpy, Graham Eglit
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Narcolepsy type 1 (NT1; narcolepsy with cataplexy) is a chronic disease which often requires multiple treatments to address its symptoms. Although cataplexy is a core symptom of narcolepsy, it often goes underrecognized and can cause limitations to daily life. The CRESCENDO survey evaluated the experience of treated patients with NT1. Here we conducted a subgroup analysis of respondents reporting residual cataplexy to better understand the burden and impact on quality of life (QoL). Methods CRESCENDO was developed in partnership with the Narcolepsy Network, conducted (October–December 2023) by a third-party research firm, and included adults diagnosed with NT1 currently taking FDA-approved narcolepsy medication. Results Patients reporting residual cataplexy (n=156; 76.8%) were older (median age 42.0 vs 38.0 yrs) and more likely to identify as White (76.3% vs 51.1%) and female (70.5% vs 42.6%), compared with those reporting no residual cataplexy (n=47). Polypharmacy was more common in the residual cataplexy group (65.4%) compared with the no residual cataplexy group (44.7%). The residual cataplexy group was more likely to be currently treated with antidepressants (42.9 % vs 23.4%) and less likely to be currently treated with oxybates (42.3% vs 61.7%). Patients with residual cataplexy reported greater subjective cognitive impairment (mean BC-CCI score 9.1 vs 5.2), depressive symptoms (mean PHQ-8 score 10.5 vs 7.0), and EDS (mean ESS score 13.6 vs 8.9). Patients with residual cataplexy also reported greater burden related to cognitive (any difficulty with work/school [92.9% vs 83.0%], family/friends relationship [80.8% vs 61.7%], or social activity enjoyment [88.5% vs 66.0%]) and depressive (48.7% vs 34.0% reporting very/extreme difficulty with work/home/social life) symptoms. Other residual symptoms were more frequently self-reported in the residual cataplexy group (EDS, 94.9% vs 78.7%; brain fog 87.2% vs 44.7%; depression 50.0% vs 29.8%). Conclusion Despite current treatment, residual cataplexy was common among patients with NT1, affecting a majority of NT1 patient survey respondents. These patients reported a substantial symptom burden and reduced QoL. There is prevailing unmet need for additional treatment options to treat cataplexy and improve outcomes in this population. Support (if any) Axsome Therapeutics Inc.

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Axsome Therapeutics (United States) (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.