Technical Guidelines for the Evaluation of Scientific Evidence of Health and Function Claims for Food and Food Ingredients: A Federation of Asian Nutrition Societies (FANS) Consensus

Background: Health and function claims are central to advancing nutrition science and regulatory practice, particularly across Asia, where the harmonization of nutrition labeling standards faces unique and complex challenges. Fragmented national regulatory frameworks, combined with the region’s diverse range of food ingredients and traditional herbal products, have created substantial inconsistencies in scientific evaluation practices and cross-border trade. Objective: To establish a harmonized, evidence-based technical framework for evaluating the scientific evidence underpinning health and function claims for foods and food ingredients. Methods: The Task Force on Health & Function Claims of the Federation of Asian Nutrition Societies (FANS) developed this guideline through a structured process of expert consultation, iterative peer review, and formal consensus building. The framework comprises six core components: (1) core principles; (2) standardized procedures for evidence evaluation; (3) criteria for assessing literature quality; (4) criteria for grading evidence strength; (5) requirements for evidence report preparation and (6) evidence-based recommendations. Results: This guideline defines standardized terminology for health and function claims, establishes core principles for evidence-based nutrition practice, specifies the requirement of qualified evaluator, details comprehensive and replicable literature evaluation procedures, and adopts a four-tiered evidence strength grading system (Grades A–D). It prescribes transparent, verifiable pathways for claim substantiation and periodic re-evaluation to uphold scientific rigor and ensure consumer protection. Conclusions: This guideline aligns with prevailing international standards while being specifically adapted to the Asian regional context. It provides a unified technical framework for the evaluation of health and function claims in Asia. It is designed to facilitate regulatory convergence across the region, safeguard consumer interests, and foster responsible innovation in the functional food sector, while laying a robust foundation for collaborative regional nutritional research and regulatory alignment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research
Published
2026-04-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31083/ijvnr49566
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technical Guidelines for the Evaluation of Scientific Evidence of Health and Function Claims for Food and Food Ingredients: A Federation of Asian Nutrition Societies (FANS) Consensus

Nalinee Chongviriyaphan, Guiju Sun, Jing Zhu, Kalpana Bhaskaran et al.
International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Technical Guidelines for the Evaluation of Scientific Evidence of Health and Function Claims for Food and Food Ingredients: A Federation of Asian Nutrition Societies (FANS) Consensus

Nalinee Chongviriyaphan, Guiju Sun, Jing Zhu, Kalpana Bhaskaran, E‐Siong Tee, Hardinsayh, Zhu Wang, Yuexin Yang, Cheng Li
article en

Abstract

Background: Health and function claims are central to advancing nutrition science and regulatory practice, particularly across Asia, where the harmonization of nutrition labeling standards faces unique and complex challenges. Fragmented national regulatory frameworks, combined with the region’s diverse range of food ingredients and traditional herbal products, have created substantial inconsistencies in scientific evaluation practices and cross-border trade. Objective: To establish a harmonized, evidence-based technical framework for evaluating the scientific evidence underpinning health and function claims for foods and food ingredients. Methods: The Task Force on Health & Function Claims of the Federation of Asian Nutrition Societies (FANS) developed this guideline through a structured process of expert consultation, iterative peer review, and formal consensus building. The framework comprises six core components: (1) core principles; (2) standardized procedures for evidence evaluation; (3) criteria for assessing literature quality; (4) criteria for grading evidence strength; (5) requirements for evidence report preparation and (6) evidence-based recommendations. Results: This guideline defines standardized terminology for health and function claims, establishes core principles for evidence-based nutrition practice, specifies the requirement of qualified evaluator, details comprehensive and replicable literature evaluation procedures, and adopts a four-tiered evidence strength grading system (Grades A–D). It prescribes transparent, verifiable pathways for claim substantiation and periodic re-evaluation to uphold scientific rigor and ensure consumer protection. Conclusions: This guideline aligns with prevailing international standards while being specifically adapted to the Asian regional context. It provides a unified technical framework for the evaluation of health and function claims in Asia. It is designed to facilitate regulatory convergence across the region, safeguard consumer interests, and foster responsible innovation in the functional food sector, while laying a robust foundation for collaborative regional nutritional research and regulatory alignment.

International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition ResearchVol. 96(2)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (CN), Chinese Center For Disease Control and Prevention (CN), Temasek Polytechnic (SG), IPB University (ID), Ministry of Education (KR), Ramathibodi Hospital (TH), Malaysia University of Science and Technology (MY), Selangor Business School (MY), Beijing Academy of Science and Technology (CN), Ministry of Education and Child Care (CA), Southeast University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.