Rethinking narrative intervention: The potential role of alternative narratives in interethnic reconciliation

Narrative intervention aims to support the achievement of reconciliation through practices that address the role of conflict narratives in shaping interethnic relations. Currently, narrative intervention practice is focused on changing endorsement of ethnocentric conflict narratives, but this article presents evidence that promoting adoption of alternative narratives, a distinct non-partisan framing of the conflict, could encourage greater engagement in reconciliation activities among a population affected by interethnic conflict. This is a new perspective on the capacity for conflict narratives to shape reconciliation outcomes as prior research has shown an association between conflict narrative endorsement and intergroup attitudes but the relationship with intergroup behavior is underexplored. We surveyed residents of Northern Ireland (n = 411) to assess how endorsement of ingroup and outgroup ethnocentric narratives and of an alternative narrative that acknowledges suffering and responsibility on both sides of the conflict relate to engagement in reconciliation activities. Multiple linear regression indicated endorsement of the alternative and outgroup narratives was positively associated with engagement in reconciliation activities. Parallel mediation analysis showed endorsement of the alternative narrative had a direct effect on engagement in reconciliation activities and an indirect effect through increased intergroup trust and decreased exclusive victimhood while outgroup narrative endorsement had only an indirect effect through increased intergroup trust. These findings suggest that if the field of narrative intervention incorporates new approaches that promote adoption of alternative narratives, this could encourage more widespread engagement in reconciliation activities and, by extension, increase the likelihood of achieving interethnic reconciliation at a societal level. • Alternative and outgroup narrative endorsement predicts reconciliatory behavior. • Narrative – behavior relationship mediated by trust and exclusive victimhood. • Existing approaches to narrative intervention neglect alternative narratives. • Promoting adoption of alternative narratives could support reconciliation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2026.102426
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking narrative intervention: The potential role of alternative narratives in interethnic reconciliation

Rachel Rafferty, Mariska Kappmeier
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Rethinking narrative intervention: The potential role of alternative narratives in interethnic reconciliation

Rachel Rafferty, Mariska Kappmeier
article en

Abstract

Narrative intervention aims to support the achievement of reconciliation through practices that address the role of conflict narratives in shaping interethnic relations. Currently, narrative intervention practice is focused on changing endorsement of ethnocentric conflict narratives, but this article presents evidence that promoting adoption of alternative narratives, a distinct non-partisan framing of the conflict, could encourage greater engagement in reconciliation activities among a population affected by interethnic conflict. This is a new perspective on the capacity for conflict narratives to shape reconciliation outcomes as prior research has shown an association between conflict narrative endorsement and intergroup attitudes but the relationship with intergroup behavior is underexplored. We surveyed residents of Northern Ireland (n = 411) to assess how endorsement of ingroup and outgroup ethnocentric narratives and of an alternative narrative that acknowledges suffering and responsibility on both sides of the conflict relate to engagement in reconciliation activities. Multiple linear regression indicated endorsement of the alternative and outgroup narratives was positively associated with engagement in reconciliation activities. Parallel mediation analysis showed endorsement of the alternative narrative had a direct effect on engagement in reconciliation activities and an indirect effect through increased intergroup trust and decreased exclusive victimhood while outgroup narrative endorsement had only an indirect effect through increased intergroup trust. These findings suggest that if the field of narrative intervention incorporates new approaches that promote adoption of alternative narratives, this could encourage more widespread engagement in reconciliation activities and, by extension, increase the likelihood of achieving interethnic reconciliation at a societal level. • Alternative and outgroup narrative endorsement predicts reconciliatory behavior. • Narrative – behavior relationship mediated by trust and exclusive victimhood. • Existing approaches to narrative intervention neglect alternative narratives. • Promoting adoption of alternative narratives could support reconciliation.

International Journal of Intercultural RelationsVol. 113
University of Derby (GB), University of Otago (NZ)
University of Otago
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.