0605 Early Identification of Common PAP-Associated Problems: Evaluation of the PAP Issue Stratification Tool (PIST)

Abstract Introduction Treatment-related problems during early positive airway pressure therapy (PAP) create adherence barriers. We evaluated the factor structure of a brief screening tool for common PAP problems, determined a scoring approach, and assessed predictive validity for non-adherence to support PAP troubleshooting. Methods A one-group, prospective observational design at Kaiser Permanente Southern California consecutively enrolled PAP-naïve adults with moderate-severe OSA (AHI4%≥15) who accepted PAP (autoCPAP). A PAP Issue Stratification Tool (PIST) survey (content validated by patient and sleep clinician panels) included 32 common PAP issues rated on a 4-point Likert scale for the question, “how much does each issue bother you?” Patients who used PAP≥30 minutes on ≥2 of first 5 days received a survey link on treatment day 5, 10, and 30. Objective PAP use was collected for days 1-90. Exploratory factor analysis (promax) informed domain structure and scoring. PIST total and domain scores were calculated on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more bothersome issues. Using Day 10 PIST responses, we compared total and domain scores between adherers and non-adherers for usage intervals Days 1-30, 1-90, 61-90 using t-tests (adherence: ≥4 hours/night on ≥70% of days). Results Of 306 eligible patients, 216 completed Day 10 PIST. Thirteen items had ≥70% endorsement of “not at all”; four items were removed for low communality or overlapping clinical constructs. Cronbach r=0.90. Factor analysis included 27 items with 59% of variance explained by 5 factors: (1) mask-related symptoms and distress, (2) sleep disturbances, (3) psychosocial and practical burdens, (4) device-related challenges, and (5) physiological side effects. For t-tests, 211 participants were included (>2 items incomplete, removed [n=5]). PAP adherence rates were: 59% (Days 1-30); 50% (Days 1-90); 46% (Days 61-90). Total PIST score and domain 1 scores were higher for non-adherers at all outcome intervals (p<.001). Domain 2 and 4 scores were higher for non-adherers for Days 1-30 and Days 1-90 (p<.05). Domain 3 was higher at Day 1-90 (p<.05). Conclusion The 27-item PIST is a valid screening instrument for identifying clinical PAP issues. Early identification of mask-related symptoms, sleep disturbances, and device-related challenges may inform targeted interventions to improve PAP adherence. Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0604
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0605 Early Identification of Common PAP-Associated Problems: Evaluation of the PAP Issue Stratification Tool (PIST)

Jungwon Min, Dennis Hwang, Amy Sawyer, Rui Yan et al.
SLEEP
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

0605 Early Identification of Common PAP-Associated Problems: Evaluation of the PAP Issue Stratification Tool (PIST)

Jungwon Min, Dennis Hwang, Amy Sawyer, Rui Yan, Jessica Yara, Alexa Watach, Jiaxiao Shi, Matthew T Klimper
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Treatment-related problems during early positive airway pressure therapy (PAP) create adherence barriers. We evaluated the factor structure of a brief screening tool for common PAP problems, determined a scoring approach, and assessed predictive validity for non-adherence to support PAP troubleshooting. Methods A one-group, prospective observational design at Kaiser Permanente Southern California consecutively enrolled PAP-naïve adults with moderate-severe OSA (AHI4%≥15) who accepted PAP (autoCPAP). A PAP Issue Stratification Tool (PIST) survey (content validated by patient and sleep clinician panels) included 32 common PAP issues rated on a 4-point Likert scale for the question, “how much does each issue bother you?” Patients who used PAP≥30 minutes on ≥2 of first 5 days received a survey link on treatment day 5, 10, and 30. Objective PAP use was collected for days 1-90. Exploratory factor analysis (promax) informed domain structure and scoring. PIST total and domain scores were calculated on a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating more bothersome issues. Using Day 10 PIST responses, we compared total and domain scores between adherers and non-adherers for usage intervals Days 1-30, 1-90, 61-90 using t-tests (adherence: ≥4 hours/night on ≥70% of days). Results Of 306 eligible patients, 216 completed Day 10 PIST. Thirteen items had ≥70% endorsement of “not at all”; four items were removed for low communality or overlapping clinical constructs. Cronbach r=0.90. Factor analysis included 27 items with 59% of variance explained by 5 factors: (1) mask-related symptoms and distress, (2) sleep disturbances, (3) psychosocial and practical burdens, (4) device-related challenges, and (5) physiological side effects. For t-tests, 211 participants were included (>2 items incomplete, removed [n=5]). PAP adherence rates were: 59% (Days 1-30); 50% (Days 1-90); 46% (Days 61-90). Total PIST score and domain 1 scores were higher for non-adherers at all outcome intervals (p<.001). Domain 2 and 4 scores were higher for non-adherers for Days 1-30 and Days 1-90 (p<.05). Domain 3 was higher at Day 1-90 (p<.05). Conclusion The 27-item PIST is a valid screening instrument for identifying clinical PAP issues. Early identification of mask-related symptoms, sleep disturbances, and device-related challenges may inform targeted interventions to improve PAP adherence. Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Kaiser Permanente (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.