Pedagogical Innovation in Digital Environments: A Systematic Review Focused on Higher Education

<ns3:p>This systematic review analyzed the scientific evidence published between 2020 and August 2025 on pedagogical innovations, digital environments, and university experiences. Its objective was to characterize how these categories have been investigated in terms of contributions, limitations, and results in higher education. Eligibility criteria were established that included studies (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed) developed exclusively in university contexts, with explicit methodological design, defined sample, peer review, and accessible data. Reviews, grey literature, articles without a specific sample or with unmitigated methodological bias were excluded. The sources of information were Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Springer, SciELO, among others. The last search was carried out in August 2025, closing with the identification of 539 studies; of these, 39 met the inclusion criteria. Participants were university students, teachers, and experts (total = 9927) from different regions of the world, with sample sizes ranging from 7 to 3268; the average was 254.54. A validated instrument was applied to assess risk of bias, classifying studies as low risk (n = 22), moderate (n = 17), and high risk (n = 0). The results were synthesized through thematic analysis and tabulation of methodological characteristics. Improvements were reported in motivation, self-regulation, academic performance, and digital skills, although gaps in connectivity, teacher training, and institutional sustainability persisted. The results suggest that the impact of educational technology depends mainly on pedagogical design, teaching accompaniment and university policies.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.176682.1
Primary Topic
Digital literacy in education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pedagogical Innovation in Digital Environments: A Systematic Review Focused on Higher Education

Miguel Carrasco Muñoz, Reynaldo Marcial Ostos Miraval, Consuelo Nora Casimiro Urcos, Walther Hernan Casimiro Urcos et al.
F1000Research
Digital literacy in education
article

Pedagogical Innovation in Digital Environments: A Systematic Review Focused on Higher Education

Miguel Carrasco Muñoz, Reynaldo Marcial Ostos Miraval, Consuelo Nora Casimiro Urcos, Walther Hernan Casimiro Urcos, Livia Cristina Piñas Rivera, Nancy Elizabeth Alberca Pintado
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>This systematic review analyzed the scientific evidence published between 2020 and August 2025 on pedagogical innovations, digital environments, and university experiences. Its objective was to characterize how these categories have been investigated in terms of contributions, limitations, and results in higher education. Eligibility criteria were established that included studies (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed) developed exclusively in university contexts, with explicit methodological design, defined sample, peer review, and accessible data. Reviews, grey literature, articles without a specific sample or with unmitigated methodological bias were excluded. The sources of information were Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Springer, SciELO, among others. The last search was carried out in August 2025, closing with the identification of 539 studies; of these, 39 met the inclusion criteria. Participants were university students, teachers, and experts (total = 9927) from different regions of the world, with sample sizes ranging from 7 to 3268; the average was 254.54. A validated instrument was applied to assess risk of bias, classifying studies as low risk (n = 22), moderate (n = 17), and high risk (n = 0). The results were synthesized through thematic analysis and tabulation of methodological characteristics. Improvements were reported in motivation, self-regulation, academic performance, and digital skills, although gaps in connectivity, teacher training, and institutional sustainability persisted. The results suggest that the impact of educational technology depends mainly on pedagogical design, teaching accompaniment and university policies.</ns3:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 15
National University of San Marcos (PE), National University of Education Enrique Guzmán y Valle (PE), Universidad Nacional Hermilio Valdizán (PE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digital literacy in education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.