0843 Longitudinal Predictors of Sleep Problems Among Co-Residing Family Caregivers of Older Adults: Findings from National Data

Abstract Introduction Sleep disturbance is prevalent among family caregivers; however, prior studies have largely examined global sleep quality cross-sectionally rather than using longitudinal approaches to understand specific problems. General sleep difficulty and caregiving-related interruptions likely have different drivers. For instance, care recipient dementia or sleep disturbance may necessitate nighttime care and increase caregiving-related sleep interruptions, whereas caregiver strain may underlie a general sleep problem in caregivers. Using a national, longitudinal sample of co-residing caregivers of older adults, we examined whether baseline caregiver strain and care recipient characteristics predict difficulty resuming sleep and caregiving-related sleep interruptions at 2-year follow-up. Methods We analyzed data from the National Study of Caregiving (NSOC) linked to the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) Rounds 5 (baseline) and 7 (follow-up). In a sample of 608 co-residing caregivers, we conducted logistic regression to examine caregiver sleep problems (difficulty resuming sleep and caregiving-related interruption) at follow-up in relation to baseline care recipients’ factors (sleep disturbances and dementia status), caregiver physical, emotional, and social strain. Covariates included caregivers’ sleep problems and demographics at baseline. Survey weights were applied. Results Co-residing caregivers were predominately female (63.8%) and Non-Hispanic White (64.6%). About 20.0% were caring for older adults living with dementia. At baseline, 47.7% of caregivers reported difficulty resuming sleep and 23.8% experienced caregiving-related sleep interruptions. Baseline care recipient sleep and physical strain were not significantly associated with either caregiver sleep problem at follow-up. Compared to non-dementia caregivers, dementia caregivers had 2.81 times the odds of caregiving-related sleep interruptions at follow-up (95%CI [1.15–6.86]). Caregivers’ emotional strain (OR=1.83, 95%CI [1.02–3.26]) was associated with caregiving-related sleep interruptions. Notably, caregivers’ social strain was associated with both difficulty resuming sleep (OR=2.15, 95%CI [1.22–3.79]) and caregiving-related sleep interruptions (OR=2.95, 95%CI [1.42–6.17]). Conclusion Findings suggest caregiver sleep problems may be primarily driven by caregiver strain and the dementia care context. Interventions to improve caregiver sleep should prioritize alleviating caregivers’ social and emotional strain, with targeted support for dementia caregivers. Incorporating objective sleep measures in future studies would help validate self-reported sleep disturbances and better understand the impact of caregiver strain. Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0842
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0843 Longitudinal Predictors of Sleep Problems Among Co-Residing Family Caregivers of Older Adults: Findings from National Data

Yiqing Qian, katherine ornstein, Junxin Li, Youngmin Cho
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

0843 Longitudinal Predictors of Sleep Problems Among Co-Residing Family Caregivers of Older Adults: Findings from National Data

Yiqing Qian, katherine ornstein, Junxin Li, Youngmin Cho
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Sleep disturbance is prevalent among family caregivers; however, prior studies have largely examined global sleep quality cross-sectionally rather than using longitudinal approaches to understand specific problems. General sleep difficulty and caregiving-related interruptions likely have different drivers. For instance, care recipient dementia or sleep disturbance may necessitate nighttime care and increase caregiving-related sleep interruptions, whereas caregiver strain may underlie a general sleep problem in caregivers. Using a national, longitudinal sample of co-residing caregivers of older adults, we examined whether baseline caregiver strain and care recipient characteristics predict difficulty resuming sleep and caregiving-related sleep interruptions at 2-year follow-up. Methods We analyzed data from the National Study of Caregiving (NSOC) linked to the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) Rounds 5 (baseline) and 7 (follow-up). In a sample of 608 co-residing caregivers, we conducted logistic regression to examine caregiver sleep problems (difficulty resuming sleep and caregiving-related interruption) at follow-up in relation to baseline care recipients’ factors (sleep disturbances and dementia status), caregiver physical, emotional, and social strain. Covariates included caregivers’ sleep problems and demographics at baseline. Survey weights were applied. Results Co-residing caregivers were predominately female (63.8%) and Non-Hispanic White (64.6%). About 20.0% were caring for older adults living with dementia. At baseline, 47.7% of caregivers reported difficulty resuming sleep and 23.8% experienced caregiving-related sleep interruptions. Baseline care recipient sleep and physical strain were not significantly associated with either caregiver sleep problem at follow-up. Compared to non-dementia caregivers, dementia caregivers had 2.81 times the odds of caregiving-related sleep interruptions at follow-up (95%CI [1.15–6.86]). Caregivers’ emotional strain (OR=1.83, 95%CI [1.02–3.26]) was associated with caregiving-related sleep interruptions. Notably, caregivers’ social strain was associated with both difficulty resuming sleep (OR=2.15, 95%CI [1.22–3.79]) and caregiving-related sleep interruptions (OR=2.95, 95%CI [1.42–6.17]). Conclusion Findings suggest caregiver sleep problems may be primarily driven by caregiver strain and the dementia care context. Interventions to improve caregiver sleep should prioritize alleviating caregivers’ social and emotional strain, with targeted support for dementia caregivers. Incorporating objective sleep measures in future studies would help validate self-reported sleep disturbances and better understand the impact of caregiver strain. Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.