The One Health Paradigm and Wild Animal Welfare Science

Initiatives protecting wild animal health, including vaccination campaigns, medical treatments, and parasite control programs, have been implemented for decades. Their goal has been to safeguard human well-being, as well as to further conservationist goals. This paper argues that the well-being of wild animals, considered as sentient individuals, should be another crucial reason to expand these measures. Rather than treating animal health in a purely instrumental manner, this perspective aligns more closely with the ethos of the One Health paradigm. The paper presents examples of existing programs that benefit wild animals and could be broadened based on this idea. Next, it explains the kind of cross-disciplinary research framework-integrating animal welfare science, ecology, and other disciplines-needed to successfully develop effective ways to help wild animals. It then argues that the reasons to protect wild animal health also apply in the case of other ways to help wild animals. This is relevant especially in light of the very large scale of wild animal suffering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180126100152
Primary Topic
Zoonotic diseases and public health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The One Health Paradigm and Wild Animal Welfare Science

Óscar Horta, Iria Murado-Carballo
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Zoonotic diseases and public health
article

The One Health Paradigm and Wild Animal Welfare Science

Óscar Horta, Iria Murado-Carballo
article en

Abstract

Initiatives protecting wild animal health, including vaccination campaigns, medical treatments, and parasite control programs, have been implemented for decades. Their goal has been to safeguard human well-being, as well as to further conservationist goals. This paper argues that the well-being of wild animals, considered as sentient individuals, should be another crucial reason to expand these measures. Rather than treating animal health in a purely instrumental manner, this perspective aligns more closely with the ethos of the One Health paradigm. The paper presents examples of existing programs that benefit wild animals and could be broadened based on this idea. Next, it explains the kind of cross-disciplinary research framework-integrating animal welfare science, ecology, and other disciplines-needed to successfully develop effective ways to help wild animals. It then argues that the reasons to protect wild animal health also apply in the case of other ways to help wild animals. This is relevant especially in light of the very large scale of wild animal suffering.

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Zoonotic diseases and public health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The One Health Paradigm and Wild Animal Welfare Science — Óscar Horta, Iria Murado-Carballo · Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS