Forging Bangladesh's market state: The politics of state-led Neoliberalism under the Awami League (2009–2024)

Abstract The dominance of neoliberalism has restructured state functions globally and produced what scholars describe as a "market state" , whose legitimacy is increasingly grounded in the promotion of market-mediated opportunity and global competitiveness rather than direct welfare provision. This study examines how Bangladesh's state machinery gradually reshaped itself into a market-oriented order between 2009 and 2024 under the Awami League regime. Drawing on reports, academic work, and institutional data, the paper argues that privatization, large-scale infrastructure, and public–private partnerships fueled both rapid growth and deep social divides. While economic dynamism became the government's hallmark, widening inequality and ecological loss emerged as the project's underside. This study employs a longitudinal, qualitative case-study design using systematically triangulated secondary data. The study concludes that the Bangladeshi case exemplifies a distinct model of state-led neoliberalism, challenging the minimalist state ideal by demonstrating how state power can be leveraged to entrench market rule, resulting in a development trajectory marked by both impressive growth and high socio-ecological costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Review of Political Economy
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44216-026-00078-8
Primary Topic
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forging Bangladesh's market state: The politics of state-led Neoliberalism under the Awami League (2009–2024)

Rubel Hossen
Asian Review of Political Economy
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
article

Forging Bangladesh's market state: The politics of state-led Neoliberalism under the Awami League (2009–2024)

Rubel Hossen
article en

Abstract

Abstract The dominance of neoliberalism has restructured state functions globally and produced what scholars describe as a "market state" , whose legitimacy is increasingly grounded in the promotion of market-mediated opportunity and global competitiveness rather than direct welfare provision. This study examines how Bangladesh's state machinery gradually reshaped itself into a market-oriented order between 2009 and 2024 under the Awami League regime. Drawing on reports, academic work, and institutional data, the paper argues that privatization, large-scale infrastructure, and public–private partnerships fueled both rapid growth and deep social divides. While economic dynamism became the government's hallmark, widening inequality and ecological loss emerged as the project's underside. This study employs a longitudinal, qualitative case-study design using systematically triangulated secondary data. The study concludes that the Bangladeshi case exemplifies a distinct model of state-led neoliberalism, challenging the minimalist state ideal by demonstrating how state power can be leveraged to entrench market rule, resulting in a development trajectory marked by both impressive growth and high socio-ecological costs.

Asian Review of Political EconomyVol. 5(1)
University of Rajshahi (BD)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Bangladesh Politics, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Forging Bangladesh's market state: The politics of state-led Neoliberalism under the Awami League (2009–2024) — Rubel Hossen · Asian Review of Political Economy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS