0447 Differential Effects of CBT-I and Bright Light Therapy on Inhibitory Control and Risk-Taking Behavior in Youths with Comorbid Insomnia and Eveningness

Abstract Introduction Comorbid insomnia and eveningness are common in youth. Although cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is well-established, it is unclear how CBT-I combined with circadian-targeted bright light therapy (BLT) impacts impulsivity-related cognitive processing in this population. This study examined effects of CBT-I with and without BLT on inhibitory control and risk-taking behavior using computerized neurocognitive tasks in youths with comorbid insomnia and eveningness. Methods A total of 146 participants (mean age = 19.9, SD = 3.2, 55.5% female) with DSM-5 insomnia disorder and eveningness (Reduced Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire ≤ 11) were randomized into six weeks of CBT-I with BLT (CBT-I+BLT, N = 50), CBT-I with placebo light (CBT-I-BLT, N = 53), or waitlist group (N = 43). Inhibitory control and risk-taking behavior were assessed using Cue Go/No-Go (CGNG) task and Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Linear mixed models were applied controlled for age, gender, depression and time of testing. Results In the CGNG task, significant Time×Group interactions were found for Cue and No-cue Reaction times (RTs) (Cue: F = 3.21, p = 0.044; No-cue: F = 3.50, p = 0.033), with only CBT-I-BLT group showing significant longer RTs from pre to post-treatment (cue: p = 0.001; No-cue: p = 0.003) without increased inhibition errors, suggesting enhanced response caution. In BART, a significant Time×Group interaction was observed for overall risky behavior attempts (All adjusted pumps: F = 3.25, p = 0.042). Both CBT-I+BLT (d = 0.59, p = 0.019) and CBT-I-BLT groups (d = 0.62, p = 0.025) had increased adjusted pumps relative to waitlist, suggesting heightened exploratory engagement. Notably, only CBT-I+BLT demonstrated a significant within-group increase in total earnings (d = 0.26; p = 0.046), suggesting adaptive risk-taking behavior. No other behavioral indices showed significant between-group differences. Conclusion CBT-I significantly enhanced response caution and adjunct BLT further improved adaptive risk-taking, reflecting changes in impulsivity-related cognitive processing in youths with insomnia and eveningness. Future studies could examine the mechanisms (e.g., reward processing) underlying these decision-making changes following CBT-I and bright light therapy. Support (if any) General Research Fund from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council awarded to SXL (Ref. 17608918).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0446
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0447 Differential Effects of CBT-I and Bright Light Therapy on Inhibitory Control and Risk-Taking Behavior in Youths with Comorbid Insomnia and Eveningness

Forrest Tin Wai Cheung, X Y Chen, Joey Wing Yan Chan, Yun Kwok Wing et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

0447 Differential Effects of CBT-I and Bright Light Therapy on Inhibitory Control and Risk-Taking Behavior in Youths with Comorbid Insomnia and Eveningness

Forrest Tin Wai Cheung, X Y Chen, Joey Wing Yan Chan, Yun Kwok Wing, Michael Gradisar, Albert Martin Li, Colin Espie, Rachel Ngan Yin Chan, Xiao Li, Shirley Xin Li
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Comorbid insomnia and eveningness are common in youth. Although cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is well-established, it is unclear how CBT-I combined with circadian-targeted bright light therapy (BLT) impacts impulsivity-related cognitive processing in this population. This study examined effects of CBT-I with and without BLT on inhibitory control and risk-taking behavior using computerized neurocognitive tasks in youths with comorbid insomnia and eveningness. Methods A total of 146 participants (mean age = 19.9, SD = 3.2, 55.5% female) with DSM-5 insomnia disorder and eveningness (Reduced Morningness–Eveningness Questionnaire ≤ 11) were randomized into six weeks of CBT-I with BLT (CBT-I+BLT, N = 50), CBT-I with placebo light (CBT-I-BLT, N = 53), or waitlist group (N = 43). Inhibitory control and risk-taking behavior were assessed using Cue Go/No-Go (CGNG) task and Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Linear mixed models were applied controlled for age, gender, depression and time of testing. Results In the CGNG task, significant Time×Group interactions were found for Cue and No-cue Reaction times (RTs) (Cue: F = 3.21, p = 0.044; No-cue: F = 3.50, p = 0.033), with only CBT-I-BLT group showing significant longer RTs from pre to post-treatment (cue: p = 0.001; No-cue: p = 0.003) without increased inhibition errors, suggesting enhanced response caution. In BART, a significant Time×Group interaction was observed for overall risky behavior attempts (All adjusted pumps: F = 3.25, p = 0.042). Both CBT-I+BLT (d = 0.59, p = 0.019) and CBT-I-BLT groups (d = 0.62, p = 0.025) had increased adjusted pumps relative to waitlist, suggesting heightened exploratory engagement. Notably, only CBT-I+BLT demonstrated a significant within-group increase in total earnings (d = 0.26; p = 0.046), suggesting adaptive risk-taking behavior. No other behavioral indices showed significant between-group differences. Conclusion CBT-I significantly enhanced response caution and adjunct BLT further improved adaptive risk-taking, reflecting changes in impulsivity-related cognitive processing in youths with insomnia and eveningness. Future studies could examine the mechanisms (e.g., reward processing) underlying these decision-making changes following CBT-I and bright light therapy. Support (if any) General Research Fund from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council awarded to SXL (Ref. 17608918).

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), Sleep Research Society (US), University of Oxford (GB), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.