0196 Late and Irregular Sleep-Wake Schedules Increase Sleep Propensity and Impair Neurobehavioral Performance, but Not Subjective Sleepiness in the Morning

Abstract Introduction While irregular sleep schedules are associated with poorer academic performance, delayed circadian timing, and adverse health, causal evidence remains limited. We conducted a randomized trial to probe the effects of sleep regularity on morning sleep propensity, neurobehavioral performance, and subjective sleepiness. Methods Healthy adults (n=25, 9F, mean±SD age: 27.2±3.8 years) completed a 26-day inpatient protocol that included an initial 24-hour baseline day, followed by 21 days on a randomized Early Regular (ER), Late Regular (LR), or Irregular (IR) sleep-wake/dark-light schedule, a subsequent 30-hour interval of 90-minute “ultradian days”, and a final 24-hour recovery day. Each randomized sleep-wake/dark-light schedule was based on observed schedules from a study in college students. Schedules were selected for regularity based on the Sleep Regularity Index being >80 for ER and LR schedules or < 60 for the IR schedule, and for timing as either Early (ER: scheduled sleep midpoint 3:57±0:39 h) or Late (LR: 6:29±0:40; IR: 7:01±1:58). Morning sleep propensity, the primary outcome, was measured using polysomnography-assessed sleep onset latency (SOL) averaged across sleep episodes scheduled at 7:30, 9:00, and 10:30. At 08:30 and 11:30, neurobehavioral performance was measured by a 10-minute PVT, with attentional failures (reaction time >500 ms) as the primary endpoint, and subjective sleepiness was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Results Schedule significantly impacted sleep propensity and attentional failures (both, p< 0.03) but not sleepiness (p=0.50). Compared to the ER schedule, which was associated with, on average, the longest SOL (29.32±4.76 minutes), SOL was significantly shorter in IR schedules (11.22±1.66 minutes, p< 0.01) but not in LR schedules (18.74±4.25 minutes, p=0.11). There were significantly fewer attentional failures in the ER compared to the LR (p< 0.01) and IR schedules (p< 0.03). Conclusion An early regular schedule is associated with lower sleep propensity and better neurobehavioral performance in the morning compared to late and irregular schedules. Increased morning sleep propensity and neurobehavioral performance impairment associated with late and irregular schedules was not recognized, since concomitant self-reported sleepiness scores did not differ among schedules; this has implications for behavior changes, learning, and safety. Support (if any) NIH R01-HL128538 & UL1 RR025758

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0196
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0196 Late and Irregular Sleep-Wake Schedules Increase Sleep Propensity and Impair Neurobehavioral Performance, but Not Subjective Sleepiness in the Morning

Shauni Omond, Elizabeth Klerman, Leilah Grant, Cassie Hilditch et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

0196 Late and Irregular Sleep-Wake Schedules Increase Sleep Propensity and Impair Neurobehavioral Performance, but Not Subjective Sleepiness in the Morning

Shauni Omond, Elizabeth Klerman, Leilah Grant, Cassie Hilditch, Melissa St. Hilaire, Charles Czeisler, Shadab Rahman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction While irregular sleep schedules are associated with poorer academic performance, delayed circadian timing, and adverse health, causal evidence remains limited. We conducted a randomized trial to probe the effects of sleep regularity on morning sleep propensity, neurobehavioral performance, and subjective sleepiness. Methods Healthy adults (n=25, 9F, mean±SD age: 27.2±3.8 years) completed a 26-day inpatient protocol that included an initial 24-hour baseline day, followed by 21 days on a randomized Early Regular (ER), Late Regular (LR), or Irregular (IR) sleep-wake/dark-light schedule, a subsequent 30-hour interval of 90-minute “ultradian days”, and a final 24-hour recovery day. Each randomized sleep-wake/dark-light schedule was based on observed schedules from a study in college students. Schedules were selected for regularity based on the Sleep Regularity Index being >80 for ER and LR schedules or < 60 for the IR schedule, and for timing as either Early (ER: scheduled sleep midpoint 3:57±0:39 h) or Late (LR: 6:29±0:40; IR: 7:01±1:58). Morning sleep propensity, the primary outcome, was measured using polysomnography-assessed sleep onset latency (SOL) averaged across sleep episodes scheduled at 7:30, 9:00, and 10:30. At 08:30 and 11:30, neurobehavioral performance was measured by a 10-minute PVT, with attentional failures (reaction time >500 ms) as the primary endpoint, and subjective sleepiness was assessed using a visual analogue scale. Results Schedule significantly impacted sleep propensity and attentional failures (both, p< 0.03) but not sleepiness (p=0.50). Compared to the ER schedule, which was associated with, on average, the longest SOL (29.32±4.76 minutes), SOL was significantly shorter in IR schedules (11.22±1.66 minutes, p< 0.01) but not in LR schedules (18.74±4.25 minutes, p=0.11). There were significantly fewer attentional failures in the ER compared to the LR (p< 0.01) and IR schedules (p< 0.03). Conclusion An early regular schedule is associated with lower sleep propensity and better neurobehavioral performance in the morning compared to late and irregular schedules. Increased morning sleep propensity and neurobehavioral performance impairment associated with late and irregular schedules was not recognized, since concomitant self-reported sleepiness scores did not differ among schedules; this has implications for behavior changes, learning, and safety. Support (if any) NIH R01-HL128538 & UL1 RR025758

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), Merrimack College (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Central Queensland University (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.