0177 Impact of Blue-Light Blocking Glasses on Perceived Sleep Quality in College Students with Poor Sleep Quality

Abstract Introduction Evening exposure to blue light from electronics can disrupt circadian rhythms and worsen sleep quality. College students frequently use screens before bed, often experiencing poor sleep, increased daytime sleepiness, and reduced alertness as a result. Blue-light blocking glasses with amber lenses block this light from reaching the eyes and may support a healthier circadian timing and lessen downstream effects. Past studies indicate improvements in sleep quality, sleep efficiency, and daytime alertness when glasses are worn before bed. This study examines the impact of evening use of amber glasses on self-reported sleep factors in college students with poor sleep quality. Methods Six undergraduate students (male=3; mean age=19.83, SD=1.47 years) who reported poor sleep quality (global screening scores ≥5 and/or sleep efficiency scores ≤82% on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) completed one week of typical sleep (baseline). The following two weeks, participants wore amber glasses two hours prior to bedtime. Participants wore a wrist actigraph (Philips Respironics) to measure time in bed (TIB) and total sleep time (TST). After both baseline and intervention periods, participants completed surveys examining demographics, depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), fatigue (Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue), and sleep quality (PSQI). Results Preliminary paired t-tests showed significant increases in TIB (Baseline=484.3 min, Intervention=537.0 min, t(5)=-4.871, p=.005) and TST (Baseline=398.5 min, Intervention=447.5 min) after the intervention (t(5)=-5.527, p=.003). PSQI global scores improved from 9.17 (SD=3.25) at baseline to 5.00 (SD=1.67) after the intervention (t(5)=-2.751, p=.040). Moderate effect sizes indicated improvements in subjective reports of sleep efficiency (PSQI-derived, Baseline=71.69%; Intervention=86.73%, d=-0.589), fatigue (Baseline=24.56; Intervention=21.38 d=0.525), and sleepiness (Baseline=6.50; Intervention=4.33, d=0.469). Depression and anxiety symptoms did not significantly change. Conclusion These preliminary findings indicate that wearing amber glasses prior to bed may increase sleep duration and improve subjective sleep quality. While not significant, effect sizes for sleep efficiency, fatigue, and sleepiness imply that students may have experienced better sleep and reduced next-day symptoms when using the glasses. More data are needed to draw definitive conclusions, but amber glasses may offer an accessible and inexpensive method to improve sleep. Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0177
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0177 Impact of Blue-Light Blocking Glasses on Perceived Sleep Quality in College Students with Poor Sleep Quality

Rich Rice, Kate Batterson, Jonathan Conrady, Dharmik Namineni et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

0177 Impact of Blue-Light Blocking Glasses on Perceived Sleep Quality in College Students with Poor Sleep Quality

Rich Rice, Kate Batterson, Jonathan Conrady, Dharmik Namineni, Jane Poinsette, Alexandria Reynolds, Jessica Green
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Evening exposure to blue light from electronics can disrupt circadian rhythms and worsen sleep quality. College students frequently use screens before bed, often experiencing poor sleep, increased daytime sleepiness, and reduced alertness as a result. Blue-light blocking glasses with amber lenses block this light from reaching the eyes and may support a healthier circadian timing and lessen downstream effects. Past studies indicate improvements in sleep quality, sleep efficiency, and daytime alertness when glasses are worn before bed. This study examines the impact of evening use of amber glasses on self-reported sleep factors in college students with poor sleep quality. Methods Six undergraduate students (male=3; mean age=19.83, SD=1.47 years) who reported poor sleep quality (global screening scores ≥5 and/or sleep efficiency scores ≤82% on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI) completed one week of typical sleep (baseline). The following two weeks, participants wore amber glasses two hours prior to bedtime. Participants wore a wrist actigraph (Philips Respironics) to measure time in bed (TIB) and total sleep time (TST). After both baseline and intervention periods, participants completed surveys examining demographics, depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale), sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), fatigue (Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue), and sleep quality (PSQI). Results Preliminary paired t-tests showed significant increases in TIB (Baseline=484.3 min, Intervention=537.0 min, t(5)=-4.871, p=.005) and TST (Baseline=398.5 min, Intervention=447.5 min) after the intervention (t(5)=-5.527, p=.003). PSQI global scores improved from 9.17 (SD=3.25) at baseline to 5.00 (SD=1.67) after the intervention (t(5)=-2.751, p=.040). Moderate effect sizes indicated improvements in subjective reports of sleep efficiency (PSQI-derived, Baseline=71.69%; Intervention=86.73%, d=-0.589), fatigue (Baseline=24.56; Intervention=21.38 d=0.525), and sleepiness (Baseline=6.50; Intervention=4.33, d=0.469). Depression and anxiety symptoms did not significantly change. Conclusion These preliminary findings indicate that wearing amber glasses prior to bed may increase sleep duration and improve subjective sleep quality. While not significant, effect sizes for sleep efficiency, fatigue, and sleepiness imply that students may have experienced better sleep and reduced next-day symptoms when using the glasses. More data are needed to draw definitive conclusions, but amber glasses may offer an accessible and inexpensive method to improve sleep. Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
University of South Carolina (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.