Structural and Sociodemographic Determinants of BREAST-Q Outcomes After Gender-Affirming Breast Augmentation in Transgender Women
Purpose: Sociodemographic factors are associated with disparities in postoperative outcomes after gender-affirming surgery, yet their relationship with patient-reported outcomes after gender-affirming breast augmentation remains unclear.We evaluated associations between patient-level and structural factors and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among transgender women after breast augmentation.Methods: Patients who underwent gender-affirming breast augmentation from 2015 to 2023 at two affiliated institutions, a county safety-net hospital and an academic medical center, were recruited to complete a postoperative BREAST-Q Augmentation Module survey 12 months after surgery.Six subscales were analyzed.Univariate linear regression was used to assess associations between sociodemographic, clinical, and surgical factors and BREAST-Q scores.Results: Among 270 eligible patients, 65 (24 %) completed the BREAST-Q 1 year postaugmentation.Surgeries performed at the county hospital correlated with lower satisfaction with breasts ( = -15.45;p = 0.032), psychosocial well-being ( = -15.46;p = 0.042), and physical well-being ( = -14.23;p = 0.002) compared to procedures performed at the academic setting.Current tobacco use at the pre-operative visit was associated with lower postoperative psychosocial well-being ( = -23.78;p = 0.028).Severe obesity (BMI 35 kg/m) was linked to lower implant satisfaction ( = -1.66;p = 0.013).Black patients reported higher sexual wellbeing compared with non-Hispanic White patients ( = +25.67;p = 0.016).No significant associations were found between other sociodemographic factors, surgical variables (implant size, shape, texture, incision), complications, or race/ethnicity for the remaining BREAST-Q subscales.Conclusion: After gender-affirming breast augmentation, patient-reported satisfaction and wellbeing among transgender women undergoing breast augmentation appear to be shaped more by structural context and patient-level factors rather than by the technical factors of the operation alone.
Authors
- Esther A. Kim (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2825-9463)
- Matthew F. McLaughlin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8004-6321)
- Daniel Soroudi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4022-7555)
- Zuivanna Rivas
- Daniel S. Rouhani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3404-5196)
- Dominick Falcon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3109-1679)
- Nathan Ramrakhiani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2187-3594)
- Nina Mehta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7745-9993)
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Geisinger Medical Center (US)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JPRAS Open
- Published
- 2026-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2026.05.011
- Primary Topic
- Breast Implant and Reconstruction
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00