Structural and Sociodemographic Determinants of BREAST-Q Outcomes After Gender-Affirming Breast Augmentation in Transgender Women

Purpose: Sociodemographic factors are associated with disparities in postoperative outcomes after gender-affirming surgery, yet their relationship with patient-reported outcomes after gender-affirming breast augmentation remains unclear.We evaluated associations between patient-level and structural factors and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among transgender women after breast augmentation.Methods: Patients who underwent gender-affirming breast augmentation from 2015 to 2023 at two affiliated institutions, a county safety-net hospital and an academic medical center, were recruited to complete a postoperative BREAST-Q Augmentation Module survey 12 months after surgery.Six subscales were analyzed.Univariate linear regression was used to assess associations between sociodemographic, clinical, and surgical factors and BREAST-Q scores.Results: Among 270 eligible patients, 65 (24 %) completed the BREAST-Q 1 year postaugmentation.Surgeries performed at the county hospital correlated with lower satisfaction with breasts ( = -15.45;p = 0.032), psychosocial well-being ( = -15.46;p = 0.042), and physical well-being ( = -14.23;p = 0.002) compared to procedures performed at the academic setting.Current tobacco use at the pre-operative visit was associated with lower postoperative psychosocial well-being ( = -23.78;p = 0.028).Severe obesity (BMI 35 kg/m) was linked to lower implant satisfaction ( = -1.66;p = 0.013).Black patients reported higher sexual wellbeing compared with non-Hispanic White patients ( = +25.67;p = 0.016).No significant associations were found between other sociodemographic factors, surgical variables (implant size, shape, texture, incision), complications, or race/ethnicity for the remaining BREAST-Q subscales.Conclusion: After gender-affirming breast augmentation, patient-reported satisfaction and wellbeing among transgender women undergoing breast augmentation appear to be shaped more by structural context and patient-level factors rather than by the technical factors of the operation alone.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JPRAS Open
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2026.05.011
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Structural and Sociodemographic Determinants of BREAST-Q Outcomes After Gender-Affirming Breast Augmentation in Transgender Women

Esther A. Kim, Matthew F. McLaughlin, Daniel Soroudi, Zuivanna Rivas et al.
JPRAS Open
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Structural and Sociodemographic Determinants of BREAST-Q Outcomes After Gender-Affirming Breast Augmentation in Transgender Women

Esther A. Kim, Matthew F. McLaughlin, Daniel Soroudi, Zuivanna Rivas, Daniel S. Rouhani, Dominick Falcon, Nathan Ramrakhiani, Nina Mehta
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Sociodemographic factors are associated with disparities in postoperative outcomes after gender-affirming surgery, yet their relationship with patient-reported outcomes after gender-affirming breast augmentation remains unclear.We evaluated associations between patient-level and structural factors and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among transgender women after breast augmentation.Methods: Patients who underwent gender-affirming breast augmentation from 2015 to 2023 at two affiliated institutions, a county safety-net hospital and an academic medical center, were recruited to complete a postoperative BREAST-Q Augmentation Module survey 12 months after surgery.Six subscales were analyzed.Univariate linear regression was used to assess associations between sociodemographic, clinical, and surgical factors and BREAST-Q scores.Results: Among 270 eligible patients, 65 (24 %) completed the BREAST-Q 1 year postaugmentation.Surgeries performed at the county hospital correlated with lower satisfaction with breasts ( = -15.45;p = 0.032), psychosocial well-being ( = -15.46;p = 0.042), and physical well-being ( = -14.23;p = 0.002) compared to procedures performed at the academic setting.Current tobacco use at the pre-operative visit was associated with lower postoperative psychosocial well-being ( = -23.78;p = 0.028).Severe obesity (BMI 35 kg/m) was linked to lower implant satisfaction ( = -1.66;p = 0.013).Black patients reported higher sexual wellbeing compared with non-Hispanic White patients ( = +25.67;p = 0.016).No significant associations were found between other sociodemographic factors, surgical variables (implant size, shape, texture, incision), complications, or race/ethnicity for the remaining BREAST-Q subscales.Conclusion: After gender-affirming breast augmentation, patient-reported satisfaction and wellbeing among transgender women undergoing breast augmentation appear to be shaped more by structural context and patient-level factors rather than by the technical factors of the operation alone.

JPRAS Open
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Geisinger Medical Center (US), University of California, San Francisco (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.