LogicJitter: Let LLMs play and uncover misinformation

In an era of pervasive online content, effectively distinguishing reliable information from misinformation has become an increasingly urgent challenge with broad societal implications. In this context, algorithmic solutions that focus on supervised learning can be effective within specific domains, but they require large labeled datasets for training. Producing such datasets is costly and time-consuming, and these approaches are prone to several issues, including annotation bias, temporal leakage, subjective interpretation, and poor generalization across domains. Alternative approaches include semi-supervised and weakly supervised learning, unsupervised or self-supervised methods, graph-based propagation models, zero-shot and few-shot learning, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Large Language Models (LLMs). However, these approaches also present several limitations, such as potential label noise in semi-supervised methods, spurious correlations and reduced interpretability in unsupervised approaches, unrealistic assumptions in graph-based models, sensitivity to prompt design and pre-trained knowledge in zero-shot and few-shot methods, and dependence on the availability and quality of external knowledge in RAG-based methods. To mitigate several of these limitations, we propose LogicJitter, a novel and cost-efficient fine-tuning strategy that enhances the reasoning capabilities of LLMs by exposing them to structured, logic-based games specifically designed to counteract common human cognitive biases and logical fallacies. Rather than relying solely on domain-specific misinformation data, as in prior misinformation detection approaches that use such data either for direct training or as domain-specific knowledge, our method improves detection capabilities by strengthening domain-agnostic reasoning skills. We introduce an open-source framework for automatically generating both valid and fallacious logic statements to support training and reproducibility. Empirical results demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned with LogicJitter lead to meaningful results in misinformation detection performance, highlighting the potential of reasoning-centric training as a robust alternative to traditional, data-intensive approaches. • Innovative strategy for improving AI reasoning capabilities. • Improved misinformation detection without domain-specific knowledge. • Approach to addressing cognitive biases and fallacies for consistent reasoning. • Fine-tuning method using logic games to strengthen reasoning accuracy. • Open-source package for automated logic game data generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Electrical Engineering
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2026.111215
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LogicJitter: Let LLMs play and uncover misinformation

Luca Celotti, Marco Viviani
Computers & Electrical Engineering
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

LogicJitter: Let LLMs play and uncover misinformation

Luca Celotti, Marco Viviani
article en

Abstract

In an era of pervasive online content, effectively distinguishing reliable information from misinformation has become an increasingly urgent challenge with broad societal implications. In this context, algorithmic solutions that focus on supervised learning can be effective within specific domains, but they require large labeled datasets for training. Producing such datasets is costly and time-consuming, and these approaches are prone to several issues, including annotation bias, temporal leakage, subjective interpretation, and poor generalization across domains. Alternative approaches include semi-supervised and weakly supervised learning, unsupervised or self-supervised methods, graph-based propagation models, zero-shot and few-shot learning, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Large Language Models (LLMs). However, these approaches also present several limitations, such as potential label noise in semi-supervised methods, spurious correlations and reduced interpretability in unsupervised approaches, unrealistic assumptions in graph-based models, sensitivity to prompt design and pre-trained knowledge in zero-shot and few-shot methods, and dependence on the availability and quality of external knowledge in RAG-based methods. To mitigate several of these limitations, we propose LogicJitter, a novel and cost-efficient fine-tuning strategy that enhances the reasoning capabilities of LLMs by exposing them to structured, logic-based games specifically designed to counteract common human cognitive biases and logical fallacies. Rather than relying solely on domain-specific misinformation data, as in prior misinformation detection approaches that use such data either for direct training or as domain-specific knowledge, our method improves detection capabilities by strengthening domain-agnostic reasoning skills. We introduce an open-source framework for automatically generating both valid and fallacious logic statements to support training and reproducibility. Empirical results demonstrate that LLMs fine-tuned with LogicJitter lead to meaningful results in misinformation detection performance, highlighting the potential of reasoning-centric training as a robust alternative to traditional, data-intensive approaches. • Innovative strategy for improving AI reasoning capabilities. • Improved misinformation detection without domain-specific knowledge. • Approach to addressing cognitive biases and fallacies for consistent reasoning. • Fine-tuning method using logic games to strengthen reasoning accuracy. • Open-source package for automated logic game data generation.

Computers & Electrical EngineeringVol. 136
Délégation Paris 5 (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Ministero dell'Istruzione e del Merito
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.