Contextual safeguarding against harmful sexual behaviour and child sexual exploitation: a narrative review of Australian public inquiries into residential care

• Public inquiries have repeatedly revealed harmful sexual behaviour (HSB) and child sexual exploitation (CSE) as significant concerns in residential care. • Contextual safeguarding broadens the focus from mitigating individual risk factors to addressing the contextual factors that place children and young people at risk of HSB and CSE. These factors include inappropriate placement matching, ill-equipped workforce, fractured reporting systems, and disempowering practices. • Addressing these contextual factors requires a shift in perspective, recognising that HSB and CSE in residential care represent forms of social harm that can be prevented through collective responsibility across sectors to tackle the systemic drivers of HSB and CSE. In Australia, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse revealed the pervasiveness of harmful sexual behaviour and child sexual exploitation in contemporary residential care, as well as the profound impacts these have had on victim-survivors. Other public inquiries in Australia also demonstrated that children and young people in residential care are particularly vulnerable to being sexually harmed by other children and young people with whom they co-resided, or to being sexually exploited by adults in the community. Using a contextual safeguarding lens, this narrative review aimed to address the question, “what contextual factors within residential care systems place children and young people at risk of harmful sexual behaviour and child sexual exploitation?” Public inquiry reports published between 2005 and 2024 were retrieved through systematic search results across three data sources: an academic database, an online repository for non-government reports and the websites of Commissioners for Children and Young People across the Australian states and territories. In total, 17 reports were included in the review, and four contextual factors were synthesised through thematic analysis: (a) inappropriate placement matching; (b) ill-equipped workforce; (c) fractured reporting systems; and (d) disempowering practices. These four contextual factors highlight the challenge of implementing inquiry recommendations without first acknowledging that harmful sexual behaviour and child sexual exploitation are forms of social harm partly driven by systemic inadequacy. This underscores the need for a shift in perspective, from focusing solely on individual risks to improving the policy and practice contexts that shape the experiences of children and young people in residential care .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.109030
Primary Topic
Sex work and related issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contextual safeguarding against harmful sexual behaviour and child sexual exploitation: a narrative review of Australian public inquiries into residential care

Kenny Kor
Children and Youth Services Review
Sex work and related issues
article

Contextual safeguarding against harmful sexual behaviour and child sexual exploitation: a narrative review of Australian public inquiries into residential care

Kenny Kor
article en

Abstract

• Public inquiries have repeatedly revealed harmful sexual behaviour (HSB) and child sexual exploitation (CSE) as significant concerns in residential care. • Contextual safeguarding broadens the focus from mitigating individual risk factors to addressing the contextual factors that place children and young people at risk of HSB and CSE. These factors include inappropriate placement matching, ill-equipped workforce, fractured reporting systems, and disempowering practices. • Addressing these contextual factors requires a shift in perspective, recognising that HSB and CSE in residential care represent forms of social harm that can be prevented through collective responsibility across sectors to tackle the systemic drivers of HSB and CSE. In Australia, the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse revealed the pervasiveness of harmful sexual behaviour and child sexual exploitation in contemporary residential care, as well as the profound impacts these have had on victim-survivors. Other public inquiries in Australia also demonstrated that children and young people in residential care are particularly vulnerable to being sexually harmed by other children and young people with whom they co-resided, or to being sexually exploited by adults in the community. Using a contextual safeguarding lens, this narrative review aimed to address the question, “what contextual factors within residential care systems place children and young people at risk of harmful sexual behaviour and child sexual exploitation?” Public inquiry reports published between 2005 and 2024 were retrieved through systematic search results across three data sources: an academic database, an online repository for non-government reports and the websites of Commissioners for Children and Young People across the Australian states and territories. In total, 17 reports were included in the review, and four contextual factors were synthesised through thematic analysis: (a) inappropriate placement matching; (b) ill-equipped workforce; (c) fractured reporting systems; and (d) disempowering practices. These four contextual factors highlight the challenge of implementing inquiry recommendations without first acknowledging that harmful sexual behaviour and child sexual exploitation are forms of social harm partly driven by systemic inadequacy. This underscores the need for a shift in perspective, from focusing solely on individual risks to improving the policy and practice contexts that shape the experiences of children and young people in residential care .

Children and Youth Services Review
University of Wollongong (AU)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Sex work and related issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.