0711 Association of Polysomnographic Characteristics and Mean Sleep Latency Test Across Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence

Abstract Introduction Associations between polysomnography (PSG) variables and next-day multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) outcomes across CNS disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH) are limited to observations in narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). We analyzed PSG–MSLT associations a U.S. cohort by diagnostic subgroups (NT1, narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH)). Methods We analyzed valid paired PSG–MSLT studies from NT1, NT2, and IH patients diagnosed by clinical criteria. Analyses used Fisher’s exact tests, Kruskal–Wallis tests, ANOVA, and Spearman correlations. PSG variables were evaluated against MSLT mean sleep latency (MSL) and sleep onset REM period (SOREMP) number in the overall cohort and by subgroup. Results A total of 533 patients were included: mean age 33.9±13.4, 76.9% female. In NT1 (n=81), PSG–MSLT coupling was strongest. MSL showed the highest correlations with PSG sleep latency (ρ=0.59, p< 0.001), REM latency (REML) (ρ=0.34, p=0.002), and latencies to N1–N3. Individuals with a PSG SOREMP had shorter MSL (1.6[1.4, 3.5] vs 4.4[2.7, 7.1] min, p< 0.001), and more MSLT SOREMPs (5.0[5.0, 6.0] vs 2.0[2.0, 4.0], p< 0.001). PSG REML was negatively correlated with number of MSLT SOREMPs (ρ=-0.68, p< 0.001). In NT2 (n=149), observed associations persisted but were attenuated relative to NT1. MSL correlated with PSG sleep latency (ρ=0.26, p=0.001) and REML (ρ=0.20, p=0.017). Individuals with a PSG SOREMP had shorter MSL (3.3[2.2, 5.3] vs 5.1[3.7, 7.3] min, p=0.031) and more MSLT SOREMPs (5.0[4.0, 6.0] vs 2.0[1.0, 3.0], p< 0.001). Negative correlation between MSLT SOREMPs and PSG REML was observed (ρ=-0.41, p< 0.001). IH (n=303) displayed the weakest PSG–MSLT relationships, with patterns distinct from both NT1 and NT2. MSL correlated with PSG sleep latency (ρ=0.25, p< 0.001) and sleep stage latencies N1 and N2 (ρ=0.33 each, p< 0.001), but associations between PSG REML and MSL (ρ=0.10, p=0.098) and MSLT SOREMPS (ρ=-0.19, p>0.05) were weak. Conclusion Patients with clinical phenotypes of CDH demonstrate clear and distinct associations with next-day MSLT. NT1 shows the strongest PSG–MSLT coupling, NT2 moderate, and IH attenuated relationships. These findings underscore the potential value of PSG versus MSLT driven outcomes underscoring the absence of REM related relationships in IH that differentiate it from narcolepsy. Support (if any) None

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0710
Primary Topic
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0711 Association of Polysomnographic Characteristics and Mean Sleep Latency Test Across Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence

Jinu Johnson, Sikawat Thanaviratananich, Delaney Ryan, Katherine Beshears et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
article

0711 Association of Polysomnographic Characteristics and Mean Sleep Latency Test Across Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence

Jinu Johnson, Sikawat Thanaviratananich, Delaney Ryan, Katherine Beshears, Matheus Araujo, James Bena, Jad El Ahdab, Tyler Bare, Nancy Foldvary-Schaefer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Associations between polysomnography (PSG) variables and next-day multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) outcomes across CNS disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH) are limited to observations in narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). We analyzed PSG–MSLT associations a U.S. cohort by diagnostic subgroups (NT1, narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH)). Methods We analyzed valid paired PSG–MSLT studies from NT1, NT2, and IH patients diagnosed by clinical criteria. Analyses used Fisher’s exact tests, Kruskal–Wallis tests, ANOVA, and Spearman correlations. PSG variables were evaluated against MSLT mean sleep latency (MSL) and sleep onset REM period (SOREMP) number in the overall cohort and by subgroup. Results A total of 533 patients were included: mean age 33.9±13.4, 76.9% female. In NT1 (n=81), PSG–MSLT coupling was strongest. MSL showed the highest correlations with PSG sleep latency (ρ=0.59, p< 0.001), REM latency (REML) (ρ=0.34, p=0.002), and latencies to N1–N3. Individuals with a PSG SOREMP had shorter MSL (1.6[1.4, 3.5] vs 4.4[2.7, 7.1] min, p< 0.001), and more MSLT SOREMPs (5.0[5.0, 6.0] vs 2.0[2.0, 4.0], p< 0.001). PSG REML was negatively correlated with number of MSLT SOREMPs (ρ=-0.68, p< 0.001). In NT2 (n=149), observed associations persisted but were attenuated relative to NT1. MSL correlated with PSG sleep latency (ρ=0.26, p=0.001) and REML (ρ=0.20, p=0.017). Individuals with a PSG SOREMP had shorter MSL (3.3[2.2, 5.3] vs 5.1[3.7, 7.3] min, p=0.031) and more MSLT SOREMPs (5.0[4.0, 6.0] vs 2.0[1.0, 3.0], p< 0.001). Negative correlation between MSLT SOREMPs and PSG REML was observed (ρ=-0.41, p< 0.001). IH (n=303) displayed the weakest PSG–MSLT relationships, with patterns distinct from both NT1 and NT2. MSL correlated with PSG sleep latency (ρ=0.25, p< 0.001) and sleep stage latencies N1 and N2 (ρ=0.33 each, p< 0.001), but associations between PSG REML and MSL (ρ=0.10, p=0.098) and MSLT SOREMPS (ρ=-0.19, p>0.05) were weak. Conclusion Patients with clinical phenotypes of CDH demonstrate clear and distinct associations with next-day MSLT. NT1 shows the strongest PSG–MSLT coupling, NT2 moderate, and IH attenuated relationships. These findings underscore the potential value of PSG versus MSLT driven outcomes underscoring the absence of REM related relationships in IH that differentiate it from narcolepsy. Support (if any) None

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), The Neurological Institute (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.