An Opportunity Cost Framework of Digital Well‐Being

ABSTRACT Research on social digital technologies like smartphones and social media has grown exponentially, yet consensus on their effects on well‐being remains elusive. I introduce the Costs and Opportunities of Technology in Context (COTeC) framework, focused on defining and integrating the processes by which social technologies impact well‐being indirectly via their opportunity costs. COTeC specifies at least three such mechanisms: displacement (i.e., time reallocation: time spent on devices leaves less time for other activities), substitution (i.e., qualitative replacement: technology offers alternatives to more challenging, but often more rewarding, activities), and interference (i.e., real‐time attention reallocation: social technologies tax cognitive resources, reallocate attention, and disrupt ingrained social processes and expectations). Though evidence suggests that these mechanisms primarily undermine digital well‐being, the COTeC framework posits that their effects depend on contextual affordances: on what is being displaced, substituted, or interfered with. I consider the practical implications of the framework for policy, practice (e.g., digital detox interventions), and emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI). In short, COTeC aims to organize existing evidence of opportunity‐cost processes (e.g., phubbing vs. technoference), build on existing content‐focused and person‐focused approaches, and accelerate discoveries with practical implications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.70144
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Opportunity Cost Framework of Digital Well‐Being

Kostadin Kushlev
Social and Personality Psychology Compass
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

An Opportunity Cost Framework of Digital Well‐Being

Kostadin Kushlev
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research on social digital technologies like smartphones and social media has grown exponentially, yet consensus on their effects on well‐being remains elusive. I introduce the Costs and Opportunities of Technology in Context (COTeC) framework, focused on defining and integrating the processes by which social technologies impact well‐being indirectly via their opportunity costs. COTeC specifies at least three such mechanisms: displacement (i.e., time reallocation: time spent on devices leaves less time for other activities), substitution (i.e., qualitative replacement: technology offers alternatives to more challenging, but often more rewarding, activities), and interference (i.e., real‐time attention reallocation: social technologies tax cognitive resources, reallocate attention, and disrupt ingrained social processes and expectations). Though evidence suggests that these mechanisms primarily undermine digital well‐being, the COTeC framework posits that their effects depend on contextual affordances: on what is being displaced, substituted, or interfered with. I consider the practical implications of the framework for policy, practice (e.g., digital detox interventions), and emerging technologies like artificial intelligence (AI). In short, COTeC aims to organize existing evidence of opportunity‐cost processes (e.g., phubbing vs. technoference), build on existing content‐focused and person‐focused approaches, and accelerate discoveries with practical implications.

Social and Personality Psychology CompassVol. 20(5)
Georgetown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.