0193 Sleep Value Is Not Stable: Hourly Fluctuations and Their Association with Insomnia Symptoms

Abstract Introduction Sleep value is the relative worth individuals place on sleep and may be a critical component in understanding decisions made around sleep and the daily experience of sleep disorders. Previous studies have linked sleep value to individual traits and broader personal value systems, yet it remains unclear how sleep value fluctuates across the day or shifts in relation to momentary sleep–wake intentions. The current study presented a novel method of measuring monetary sleep value across the 24-hour day and aimed to characterize how monetary sleep value relates to daily activities and insomnia symptoms. Methods Undergraduates (N=45) completed a baseline survey of demographics and sleep-related information including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) grouping participants as insomnia vs no insomnia (ISI < 10). They then completed the Sleep Value State Questionnaire (SVSQ) once each hour for twenty-four consecutive hours reporting their intended activity for the next hour (sleep or stay awake). If intending to sleep, they reported how much they would need to be paid to stay awake; if intending to stay awake, how much to attempt to sleep. They also reported sleepiness and how much they would pay for a quality hour of sleep. Mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVAs assessed within-person differences by planned activity and between-person differences by insomnia severity. Results Significant time effects emerged for sleepiness and the monetary value of a quality hour of sleep, peaking at $20 at 4 a.m., F(5.62, 236.08) = 13.95, p < .001. Participants placed higher monetary value on sleep when it conflicted with their planned state, requiring $25 to do the opposite, F(1,42) = 54.85, p < .001, partial η² = .57. They were willing to pay more for quality sleep when planning to sleep (M = $20) versus stay awake (M = $3). Insomnia did not significantly affect monetary sleep value. Conclusion These findings show that perceived sleep value is dynamic, rising sharply during the biological night and further when aligned with immediate intentions. Planned state strongly influences sleep valuation, whereas insomnia status does not. Circadian timing and momentary goals both shape how people prioritize and value sleep. Support (if any)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0193
Primary Topic
Sleep and related disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0193 Sleep Value Is Not Stable: Hourly Fluctuations and Their Association with Insomnia Symptoms

Brandon Pattillo, Daniel Kay
SLEEP
Sleep and related disorders
article

0193 Sleep Value Is Not Stable: Hourly Fluctuations and Their Association with Insomnia Symptoms

Brandon Pattillo, Daniel Kay
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Sleep value is the relative worth individuals place on sleep and may be a critical component in understanding decisions made around sleep and the daily experience of sleep disorders. Previous studies have linked sleep value to individual traits and broader personal value systems, yet it remains unclear how sleep value fluctuates across the day or shifts in relation to momentary sleep–wake intentions. The current study presented a novel method of measuring monetary sleep value across the 24-hour day and aimed to characterize how monetary sleep value relates to daily activities and insomnia symptoms. Methods Undergraduates (N=45) completed a baseline survey of demographics and sleep-related information including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) grouping participants as insomnia vs no insomnia (ISI < 10). They then completed the Sleep Value State Questionnaire (SVSQ) once each hour for twenty-four consecutive hours reporting their intended activity for the next hour (sleep or stay awake). If intending to sleep, they reported how much they would need to be paid to stay awake; if intending to stay awake, how much to attempt to sleep. They also reported sleepiness and how much they would pay for a quality hour of sleep. Mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVAs assessed within-person differences by planned activity and between-person differences by insomnia severity. Results Significant time effects emerged for sleepiness and the monetary value of a quality hour of sleep, peaking at $20 at 4 a.m., F(5.62, 236.08) = 13.95, p < .001. Participants placed higher monetary value on sleep when it conflicted with their planned state, requiring $25 to do the opposite, F(1,42) = 54.85, p < .001, partial η² = .57. They were willing to pay more for quality sleep when planning to sleep (M = $20) versus stay awake (M = $3). Insomnia did not significantly affect monetary sleep value. Conclusion These findings show that perceived sleep value is dynamic, rising sharply during the biological night and further when aligned with immediate intentions. Planned state strongly influences sleep valuation, whereas insomnia status does not. Circadian timing and momentary goals both shape how people prioritize and value sleep. Support (if any)

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Brigham Young University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sleep and related disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.