Short- and Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Levosimendan in VA-ECMO Weaning: The WEANILEVO Randomized Double-Blind Multicenter Trial

BACKGROUND: Liberation from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remains challenging. To date, we have limited evidence from observational studies supporting pharmacological interventions to facilitate successful VA-ECMO weaning. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single dose of levosimendan in patients supported by VA-ECMO who met predefined criteria for weaning. METHODS: The WEANILEVO study was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Eighty patients from five French centers who met VA-ECMO weaning criteria were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either levosimendan (0.2 μg/kg/min) or placebo for 24 hours. The primary endpoint was VA-ECMO weaning failure, defined as absence of weaning within 48 hours, recourse to another circulatory assistance device, or death within 7 days of weaning. RESULTS: Due to halted funding, the planned number of patients could not be recruited. The final modified intention-to-treat analysis included 80 patients (40 in the levosimendan group and 40 in the control group). VA-ECMO weaning failure occurred in 25% of patients in both the levosimendan and placebo groups (OR=1.00 [95%CI: 0.36-2.75], p=1.00). Acute kidney injury at day 30 was significantly more frequent in the levosimendan group (62.5% vs. 38.5%; OR=2.67 [95%CI: 1.08-6.62], p=0.03). Patients receiving levosimendan required more vasopressor support (47.5% vs. 28.2%, p=0.07) and had longer ICU stays (12 [7-24] vs. 6 [4-13] days, p=0.02). Mortality rates at 30 days (18.0% vs. 33.3%, p=0.07) and 1 year (31.6% vs. 51.4%, p=0.08) did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan administration did not reduce VA-ECMO weaning failure in patients who already met weaning criteria; however, a clinically important benefit or harm cannot be ruled out. The observed higher incidence of acute kidney injury and longer ICU stays in the levosimendan group are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger, adequately powered trials.REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04158674.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anesthesiology
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000006143
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short- and Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Levosimendan in VA-ECMO Weaning: The WEANILEVO Randomized Double-Blind Multicenter Trial

Maxime Nguyen, Mouhamed Moussa, Vivien Berthoud, Omar Ellouze et al.
Anesthesiology
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Short- and Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Levosimendan in VA-ECMO Weaning: The WEANILEVO Randomized Double-Blind Multicenter Trial

Maxime Nguyen, Mouhamed Moussa, Vivien Berthoud, Omar Ellouze, Pierre‐Grégoire Guinot, Agnès Soudry Faure, Osama Abou-Ara, For Weanilevo trial group., Paul Michel Mertes, Belaid Bouhemad, Marc-Olivier Fischer
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liberation from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remains challenging. To date, we have limited evidence from observational studies supporting pharmacological interventions to facilitate successful VA-ECMO weaning. The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single dose of levosimendan in patients supported by VA-ECMO who met predefined criteria for weaning. METHODS: The WEANILEVO study was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Eighty patients from five French centers who met VA-ECMO weaning criteria were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either levosimendan (0.2 μg/kg/min) or placebo for 24 hours. The primary endpoint was VA-ECMO weaning failure, defined as absence of weaning within 48 hours, recourse to another circulatory assistance device, or death within 7 days of weaning. RESULTS: Due to halted funding, the planned number of patients could not be recruited. The final modified intention-to-treat analysis included 80 patients (40 in the levosimendan group and 40 in the control group). VA-ECMO weaning failure occurred in 25% of patients in both the levosimendan and placebo groups (OR=1.00 [95%CI: 0.36-2.75], p=1.00). Acute kidney injury at day 30 was significantly more frequent in the levosimendan group (62.5% vs. 38.5%; OR=2.67 [95%CI: 1.08-6.62], p=0.03). Patients receiving levosimendan required more vasopressor support (47.5% vs. 28.2%, p=0.07) and had longer ICU stays (12 [7-24] vs. 6 [4-13] days, p=0.02). Mortality rates at 30 days (18.0% vs. 33.3%, p=0.07) and 1 year (31.6% vs. 51.4%, p=0.08) did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Levosimendan administration did not reduce VA-ECMO weaning failure in patients who already met weaning criteria; however, a clinically important benefit or harm cannot be ruled out. The observed higher incidence of acute kidney injury and longer ICU stays in the levosimendan group are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger, adequately powered trials.REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04158674.

Anesthesiology
Inserm (FR), Université de Bourgogne (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie (FR), Normandie Université (FR), Center for Translational Molecular Medicine (NL), Maison des Sciences sociales et des Humanités de Dijon (FR), Hôpital Civil, Strasbourg (FR), Pulmonary and Critical Care Associates (US), Université de Strasbourg (FR), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.