New Workers or New Tasks: How Do Augmented Reality, Experience, and Task Switching Affect Worker Performance in Naval Maintenance Operations

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONThis study found that using head-mounted optical see-through augmented reality (AR) guidance in maintenance tasks led to faster completion times, especially for less experienced workers and when workers had to switch between different types of tasks. AR also made these tasks feel easier for those with less experience. For ergonomics and human factors practitioners, these results suggest that AR can be a valuable tool for improving onboarding and performance in environments where workers are new or frequently face varied tasks. Implementing AR guidance can help reduce learning curves and support more efficient work, particularly in settings with high complexity and employee turnover. However, if workers are expected to perform tasks independently without ongoing AR support, traditional, more thorough training methods may still be necessary. Practitioners should consider the nature of the work and the use of AR technology when designing onboarding and training programs to maximize both efficiency and long-term competence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2026.2662924
Primary Topic
Augmented Reality Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New Workers or New Tasks: How Do Augmented Reality, Experience, and Task Switching Affect Worker Performance in Naval Maintenance Operations

J. de Vries, Clay Greunke, Perry McDowell, James Fan
IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors
Augmented Reality Applications
article

New Workers or New Tasks: How Do Augmented Reality, Experience, and Task Switching Affect Worker Performance in Naval Maintenance Operations

J. de Vries, Clay Greunke, Perry McDowell, James Fan
article en

Abstract

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONThis study found that using head-mounted optical see-through augmented reality (AR) guidance in maintenance tasks led to faster completion times, especially for less experienced workers and when workers had to switch between different types of tasks. AR also made these tasks feel easier for those with less experience. For ergonomics and human factors practitioners, these results suggest that AR can be a valuable tool for improving onboarding and performance in environments where workers are new or frequently face varied tasks. Implementing AR guidance can help reduce learning curves and support more efficient work, particularly in settings with high complexity and employee turnover. However, if workers are expected to perform tasks independently without ongoing AR support, traditional, more thorough training methods may still be necessary. Practitioners should consider the nature of the work and the use of AR technology when designing onboarding and training programs to maximize both efficiency and long-term competence.

IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors
RAND Corporation (US), Tilburg University (NL), Naval Postgraduate School (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Augmented Reality Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

New Workers or New Tasks: How Do Augmented Reality, Experience, and Task Switching Affect Worker Performance in Naval Maintenance Operations — J. de Vries, Clay Greunke, et al. · IISE Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS