Digital health inequity in Australian primary care

BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions have the potential to improve health and wellbeing at both individual and population levels. However, the rapid development of digital health risks reinforcing existing health inequities. Addressing the digital divide is important for the sustainability of digital health innovations. OBJECTIVE: To examine definitions of digital healthcare access, identify challenges for patients, practitioners and the primary healthcare system, and propose practical strategies to reduce digital health inequities. DISCUSSION: For patients, barriers include limited access to reliable internet and devices, variable digital health literacy and concerns about trust and safety. For practitioners, technologies that are poorly integrated into clinical workflows might disrupt care and increase administrative burden. At a system level, mechanisms for the secure collection, exchange and ethical use of social determinants of health data remain underdeveloped. To realise its potential, digital health must be implemented in ways that reduce, not reinforce health inequities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of General Practice
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31128/ajgp-10-25-7853
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital health inequity in Australian primary care

Rochelle Sleaby, John Furler, Lena Sanci
Australian Journal of General Practice
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

Digital health inequity in Australian primary care

Rochelle Sleaby, John Furler, Lena Sanci
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Digital health interventions have the potential to improve health and wellbeing at both individual and population levels. However, the rapid development of digital health risks reinforcing existing health inequities. Addressing the digital divide is important for the sustainability of digital health innovations. OBJECTIVE: To examine definitions of digital healthcare access, identify challenges for patients, practitioners and the primary healthcare system, and propose practical strategies to reduce digital health inequities. DISCUSSION: For patients, barriers include limited access to reliable internet and devices, variable digital health literacy and concerns about trust and safety. For practitioners, technologies that are poorly integrated into clinical workflows might disrupt care and increase administrative burden. At a system level, mechanisms for the secure collection, exchange and ethical use of social determinants of health data remain underdeveloped. To realise its potential, digital health must be implemented in ways that reduce, not reinforce health inequities.

Australian Journal of General PracticeVol. 55(5)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Digital health inequity in Australian primary care — Rochelle Sleaby, John Furler, et al. · Australian Journal of General Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS