1185 Real-World Feasibility of Anchor Sleep in Night Shift Workers

Abstract Introduction Irregular and insufficient sleep is a widespread challenge for individuals working nightshift and rotating schedules and can exacerbate circadian misalignment. Anchor sleep is a strategy that establishes a consistent 3–4-hour window of overlapping sleep across workdays and non-workdays and has emerged as a promising strategy to improve sleep quality. This study examines whether anchor sleep is more readily implemented among individuals with fewer familial or social obligations. We hypothesized that those with fewer home-related demands will show stronger adherence to an anchor sleep intervention. Methods Data collection included participant-reported sleep diaries and demographic profiles from a hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation trial in a sample of night shift workers with Shift Work Disorder (N = 87). The trial tested a mobile application that presented behavioral recommendations to reduce circadian misalignment via anchor sleep. Only those in the active condition were included in this analysis. Successful implementation of anchor sleep was defined as starting out of phase and reporting a “lights out” time between averaging between 2:00a and 6:00a in post intervention sleep diaries. Demographic information included household and personal characteristics such as household size, number of dependents, and relationship status. Results 33.33% of participants who were not initially implementing anchor sleep were able to achieve it during at least one timepoint, and 26.44% of participants maintained it throughout the entire study. 40.23% were never able to implement anchor sleep or started but could not maintain it. Contrary to our hypothesis, results did not indicate a difference in achieving anchor sleep between those with and without dependents (χ2 =0.19, df=1, p= 0.66), or having a domestic partner (χ2 =0.61, df=1, p= 0.44). No differences were found by household size (χ2 =6.25, df=4, p= 0.18). Conclusion These findings suggest that the feasibility of achieving anchor sleep is not driven by partner status, dependents, or household size. There are likely other barriers preventing adherence to a consistent 3–4-hour sleep window. Future directions may account for additional social factors such as partner work schedules, quantitative measure of familial obligation, and support level from partners. Support (if any) NIH R42HL163783 awarded to Dr. Philip Cheng.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.1184
Primary Topic
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

1185 Real-World Feasibility of Anchor Sleep in Night Shift Workers

Courtney Barr, Christopher Drake, Marleigh Treger, Philip Cheng
SLEEP
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
article

1185 Real-World Feasibility of Anchor Sleep in Night Shift Workers

Courtney Barr, Christopher Drake, Marleigh Treger, Philip Cheng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Irregular and insufficient sleep is a widespread challenge for individuals working nightshift and rotating schedules and can exacerbate circadian misalignment. Anchor sleep is a strategy that establishes a consistent 3–4-hour window of overlapping sleep across workdays and non-workdays and has emerged as a promising strategy to improve sleep quality. This study examines whether anchor sleep is more readily implemented among individuals with fewer familial or social obligations. We hypothesized that those with fewer home-related demands will show stronger adherence to an anchor sleep intervention. Methods Data collection included participant-reported sleep diaries and demographic profiles from a hybrid type I effectiveness-implementation trial in a sample of night shift workers with Shift Work Disorder (N = 87). The trial tested a mobile application that presented behavioral recommendations to reduce circadian misalignment via anchor sleep. Only those in the active condition were included in this analysis. Successful implementation of anchor sleep was defined as starting out of phase and reporting a “lights out” time between averaging between 2:00a and 6:00a in post intervention sleep diaries. Demographic information included household and personal characteristics such as household size, number of dependents, and relationship status. Results 33.33% of participants who were not initially implementing anchor sleep were able to achieve it during at least one timepoint, and 26.44% of participants maintained it throughout the entire study. 40.23% were never able to implement anchor sleep or started but could not maintain it. Contrary to our hypothesis, results did not indicate a difference in achieving anchor sleep between those with and without dependents (χ2 =0.19, df=1, p= 0.66), or having a domestic partner (χ2 =0.61, df=1, p= 0.44). No differences were found by household size (χ2 =6.25, df=4, p= 0.18). Conclusion These findings suggest that the feasibility of achieving anchor sleep is not driven by partner status, dependents, or household size. There are likely other barriers preventing adherence to a consistent 3–4-hour sleep window. Future directions may account for additional social factors such as partner work schedules, quantitative measure of familial obligation, and support level from partners. Support (if any) NIH R42HL163783 awarded to Dr. Philip Cheng.

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Henry Ford Health System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.