The Development and Initial Psychometric Testing of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess COPD-Related Emotional Distress

Purpose: Emotional distress is prevalent in patients with COPD and highly relevant to patients. Research in chronic disease indicates that illness-related emotional distress might be specific and sensitive enough to explain self-management behaviour. However, as no currently available instrument assesses COPD-related emotional distress (CRED), it has only been assessed regarding overall distress, using mainly anxiety and depression as outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and test a preliminary item list to measure CRED. Patients and Methods: Following Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, a multistep mixed-method study was conducted. Based on an earlier qualitative study and literature review, a conceptual framework and item list were developed. The item list’s content validity was assessed via patient interviews using cognitive debriefing techniques and a survey involving a panel of clinicians. Finally, its psychometric properties were tested in a cross-sectional study. Construct validity was established by comparing the CRED-V1 with established questionnaires like the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the modified Medical Research Counsel (mMRC) dyspnoea scale. Results: The first German COPD-Related Emotional Distress questionnaire–version 1 (CRED–V1) contained 36 items. Its content validity was confirmed by nine patients and ten clinicians. Psychometric testing in 264 patients with COPD revealed two formative (symptom- and treatment-related) and four reflective (restricted mobility-, restricted relationship-, disease unpredictability- and stigma-related) subcategories. For all reflective subscales, Cronbach’s alpha values were > 0.8. Structural equation modelling was possible for 32 items: An R 2 value of 0.656 allowed the calculation of a CRED total score (CRED–TS). A regression model using the CRED-TS as the outcome variable showed that the most important explanatory variables were the CAT and HADS depression scores. Conclusion: This work reports the initial development of a new innovative tool for the assessment of CRED in patients with COPD. Keywords: pulmonary disease chronic obstructive, psychological distress, patient-reported outcome measures, psychometrics, depression, anxiety, self-management

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of COPD
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s585311
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Development and Initial Psychometric Testing of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess COPD-Related Emotional Distress

Gabriela Schmid‐Mohler, Katja-Daniela Jordan, Gian-Marco Monsch, Christine Hübsch et al.
International Journal of COPD
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

The Development and Initial Psychometric Testing of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess COPD-Related Emotional Distress

Gabriela Schmid‐Mohler, Katja-Daniela Jordan, Gian-Marco Monsch, Christine Hübsch, Christian Clarenbach, Janelle Yorke, Rafael Imhof, Marianne Mueller
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Emotional distress is prevalent in patients with COPD and highly relevant to patients. Research in chronic disease indicates that illness-related emotional distress might be specific and sensitive enough to explain self-management behaviour. However, as no currently available instrument assesses COPD-related emotional distress (CRED), it has only been assessed regarding overall distress, using mainly anxiety and depression as outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and test a preliminary item list to measure CRED. Patients and Methods: Following Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines, a multistep mixed-method study was conducted. Based on an earlier qualitative study and literature review, a conceptual framework and item list were developed. The item list’s content validity was assessed via patient interviews using cognitive debriefing techniques and a survey involving a panel of clinicians. Finally, its psychometric properties were tested in a cross-sectional study. Construct validity was established by comparing the CRED-V1 with established questionnaires like the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the modified Medical Research Counsel (mMRC) dyspnoea scale. Results: The first German COPD-Related Emotional Distress questionnaire–version 1 (CRED–V1) contained 36 items. Its content validity was confirmed by nine patients and ten clinicians. Psychometric testing in 264 patients with COPD revealed two formative (symptom- and treatment-related) and four reflective (restricted mobility-, restricted relationship-, disease unpredictability- and stigma-related) subcategories. For all reflective subscales, Cronbach’s alpha values were > 0.8. Structural equation modelling was possible for 32 items: An R 2 value of 0.656 allowed the calculation of a CRED total score (CRED–TS). A regression model using the CRED-TS as the outcome variable showed that the most important explanatory variables were the CAT and HADS depression scores. Conclusion: This work reports the initial development of a new innovative tool for the assessment of CRED in patients with COPD. Keywords: pulmonary disease chronic obstructive, psychological distress, patient-reported outcome measures, psychometrics, depression, anxiety, self-management

International Journal of COPDVol. Volume 21
Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), University of Zurich (CH), University of Manchester (GB), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Klinik für Psychosomatik (DE)
Universitätsspital Zürich
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.