0694 Polysomnographic Findings in Pediatric Patients with Narcolepsy Type 1 and Narcolepsy Type 2: A Retrospective Review

Abstract Introduction There are few large polysomnographic datasets for children and adolescents with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and 2 (NT2). This analysis aims to characterize daytime and nighttime sleep features in pediatric patients with NT1 and NT2. Methods A retrospective review of Pulse Infoframe registry data of patients aged ≤18 years with a diagnosis of NT1 or NT2 from 22 US hospitals between 2009 and 2017 was performed. All included patients underwent a clinical evaluation, Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT), and overnight polysomnography (PSG). Data were analyzed descriptively. Results In total, 471 patients were identified (NT1, 70%; NT2, 30%; male, 52%; white, 48%). MSLT: median (IQR) sleep latency was 2.1 (1.0-3.9) minutes for patients with NT1 (n=308) and 3.5 (1.7-5.6) minutes for those with NT2 (n=136). Median (IQR) sleep-onset rapid eye movement (REM) periods (SOREMPs) were 4.0 (3.0-4.0) for patients with NT1 and 4.0 (3.0-4.0) for those with NT2. PSG: respective median (range) N1 percentage and time were 8% (0%-44%) and 35.9 (0-188.3) minutes for patients with NT1 and 7% (0%-32%) and 32.5 (0-152.6) minutes for those with NT2. Respective median (range) N2 percentage and time were 49% (19%-82%) and 218.7 (3.2-427.3) minutes for patients with NT1 and 50% (16%-80%) and 237.0 (69.1-426.1) minutes for those with NT2. Respective median (range) N3 percentage and time were 21% (1%-63%) and 98.6 (2.5-354.2) minutes for patients with NT1 and 20% (2%-54%) and 98.7 (6.5-240.8) minutes for those with NT2. Respective median (range) REM percentage and latency were 19% (0%-41%) and 90.1 (0-234.2) minutes for patients with NT1 and 22% (2%-40%) and 100.0 (7.2-226.0) minutes for those with NT2. Median (range) arousals per hour were 12.6 (0-65.0) for patients with NT1 and 11.0 (0.1-38.4) for those with NT2. Conclusion Treatment of narcolepsy is often solely focused on daytime symptoms; however, sleep latency and SOREMP data point to NT1 and NT2 ultimately being disorders of both sleep and wake. Future research and patient care should consider the 24/7 nature of narcolepsy. Support (if any) Avadel Pharmaceuticals

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0693
Primary Topic
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0694 Polysomnographic Findings in Pediatric Patients with Narcolepsy Type 1 and Narcolepsy Type 2: A Retrospective Review

Narong Simakajornboon, Jennifer Gudeman, Rakesh Bhattacharjee, Anne Morse et al.
SLEEP
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
article

0694 Polysomnographic Findings in Pediatric Patients with Narcolepsy Type 1 and Narcolepsy Type 2: A Retrospective Review

Narong Simakajornboon, Jennifer Gudeman, Rakesh Bhattacharjee, Anne Morse, Luis Ortiz, Femida Gwadry-Sridhar, Gary Feldman, Judith Owens, Sally Ibrahim, Joshua Henderson, Kiran Maski, Brian Abaluck
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction There are few large polysomnographic datasets for children and adolescents with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and 2 (NT2). This analysis aims to characterize daytime and nighttime sleep features in pediatric patients with NT1 and NT2. Methods A retrospective review of Pulse Infoframe registry data of patients aged ≤18 years with a diagnosis of NT1 or NT2 from 22 US hospitals between 2009 and 2017 was performed. All included patients underwent a clinical evaluation, Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT), and overnight polysomnography (PSG). Data were analyzed descriptively. Results In total, 471 patients were identified (NT1, 70%; NT2, 30%; male, 52%; white, 48%). MSLT: median (IQR) sleep latency was 2.1 (1.0-3.9) minutes for patients with NT1 (n=308) and 3.5 (1.7-5.6) minutes for those with NT2 (n=136). Median (IQR) sleep-onset rapid eye movement (REM) periods (SOREMPs) were 4.0 (3.0-4.0) for patients with NT1 and 4.0 (3.0-4.0) for those with NT2. PSG: respective median (range) N1 percentage and time were 8% (0%-44%) and 35.9 (0-188.3) minutes for patients with NT1 and 7% (0%-32%) and 32.5 (0-152.6) minutes for those with NT2. Respective median (range) N2 percentage and time were 49% (19%-82%) and 218.7 (3.2-427.3) minutes for patients with NT1 and 50% (16%-80%) and 237.0 (69.1-426.1) minutes for those with NT2. Respective median (range) N3 percentage and time were 21% (1%-63%) and 98.6 (2.5-354.2) minutes for patients with NT1 and 20% (2%-54%) and 98.7 (6.5-240.8) minutes for those with NT2. Respective median (range) REM percentage and latency were 19% (0%-41%) and 90.1 (0-234.2) minutes for patients with NT1 and 22% (2%-40%) and 100.0 (7.2-226.0) minutes for those with NT2. Median (range) arousals per hour were 12.6 (0-65.0) for patients with NT1 and 11.0 (0.1-38.4) for those with NT2. Conclusion Treatment of narcolepsy is often solely focused on daytime symptoms; however, sleep latency and SOREMP data point to NT1 and NT2 ultimately being disorders of both sleep and wake. Future research and patient care should consider the 24/7 nature of narcolepsy. Support (if any) Avadel Pharmaceuticals

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Geisinger Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), University of California San Diego (US), Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital (US), Avanir Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), Boston Children's Museum (US), Oceaneering International (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Sleep and Wakefulness Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.