Real-World Use of Biologic Therapy in Elderly Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Background and Objectives: Psoriasis patients aged over 65 years, especially those with chronic comorbidities, constitute an increasingly important patient population. In this group, the selection of therapy, along with its efficacy and safety, is of relevance. Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of clinical records of patients aged ≥ 65 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, treated with biologic therapies. The study covered the period 2019–2025. Results: A total of 38 patients were included. Biologic switching occurred in 15 patients (39.5%). The primary reason for switching was loss of efficacy (86.7%), while adverse events accounted for 13.3% of cases. The mean duration from initiation of adalimumab (the mandatory first-line biologic therapy) to switching was 325 ± 191 days. Baseline PASI did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.139). Psoriatic arthritis was significantly less frequent among patients who switched therapy (13.3% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.008). No significant associations were observed between switching and comorbidities or overall comorbidity burden (p > 0.05). Clinically relevant adverse events included infections, cardiovascular events, malignancies, and autoimmune laboratory abnormalities. Conclusions: Biologic therapy in elderly psoriasis patients appears to be generally well tolerated, based on descriptive real-world data. Treatment switching was primarily driven by loss of efficacy rather than comorbidities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62050911
Primary Topic
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Use of Biologic Therapy in Elderly Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Vanda Bondare-Ansberga, Aleksandra Grigorjeva
Medicina
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
article

Real-World Use of Biologic Therapy in Elderly Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Vanda Bondare-Ansberga, Aleksandra Grigorjeva
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Psoriasis patients aged over 65 years, especially those with chronic comorbidities, constitute an increasingly important patient population. In this group, the selection of therapy, along with its efficacy and safety, is of relevance. Materials and Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of clinical records of patients aged ≥ 65 years with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, treated with biologic therapies. The study covered the period 2019–2025. Results: A total of 38 patients were included. Biologic switching occurred in 15 patients (39.5%). The primary reason for switching was loss of efficacy (86.7%), while adverse events accounted for 13.3% of cases. The mean duration from initiation of adalimumab (the mandatory first-line biologic therapy) to switching was 325 ± 191 days. Baseline PASI did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.139). Psoriatic arthritis was significantly less frequent among patients who switched therapy (13.3% vs. 56.5%, p = 0.008). No significant associations were observed between switching and comorbidities or overall comorbidity burden (p > 0.05). Clinically relevant adverse events included infections, cardiovascular events, malignancies, and autoimmune laboratory abnormalities. Conclusions: Biologic therapy in elderly psoriasis patients appears to be generally well tolerated, based on descriptive real-world data. Treatment switching was primarily driven by loss of efficacy rather than comorbidities.

MedicinaVol. 62(5)
Riga East University Hospital (LV), Riga Stradiņš University (LV)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.