0973 Circadian Phase Drift and Sleep–Circadian Misalignment Predict Adiposity Changes Over One Year in Adults

Abstract Introduction Circadian timing and sleep alignment have been linked to metabolic dysfunction, yet few studies have examined whether within-person annual changes in dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and alignment influence metabolic outcomes. This study examined whether annual change in DLMO timing and alignment predicted changes in metabolic markers Methods In this secondary analysis participants aged 18-65 with BMI > 25 (N = 89) completed two annual assessments including DLMO, 7-day actigraphy, and metabolic measurements (body fat %, BMI, waist–hip ratio, A1C). Circadian alignment was calculated as the duration between DLMO to sleep onset. Annual change variables were computed as Visit 5 (12-month follow-up) minus baseline. Baseline associations between DLMO and alignment were examined via linear regression. Additional linear regression models tested whether annual changes in DLMO and alignment predicted one-year changes in adiposity and A1C, adjusting for age and sex. Results Participants (age 35.31 ± 9.76 years; 48.2% female) demonstrated an average DLMO shift of –0.35 minutes (SD = 50.5 minutes), indicating essentially no overall delay or advance in circadian phase across 12 months. In contrast, circadian alignment shifted earlier by an average of –1.04 hours (SD = 1.29 hours), reflecting earlier sleep timing relative to circadian phase. Annual change in alignment was initially associated with one-year BMI change; however, the association was not robust and became non-significant after removal of a high-influence observation. Annual change in DLMO did not significantly predict changes in BMI, waist–hip ratio, A1C, or body fat %. In the body fat model, sex (B = –1.71, p = .029) and age (B = –0.09, p = .029) were significant predictors. Conclusion Circadian timing and sleep–circadian alignment were closely related at baseline, and annual alignment shifts were associated with one-year BMI change. However, annual changes in circadian phase and alignment did not consistently predict other metabolic markers. These findings suggest that sleep–circadian alignment may play a role in weight trajectories, although further research is required to clarify these associations. Support (if any) Study was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01ND018517).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsag091.0972
Primary Topic
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

0973 Circadian Phase Drift and Sleep–Circadian Misalignment Predict Adiposity Changes Over One Year in Adults

L. Quinn, Steven Carlson, Helen Burgess, Kelly Baron et al.
SLEEP
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
article

0973 Circadian Phase Drift and Sleep–Circadian Misalignment Predict Adiposity Changes Over One Year in Adults

L. Quinn, Steven Carlson, Helen Burgess, Kelly Baron, Clarisa Medina-Poeliniz, Bradley Appelhans
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Circadian timing and sleep alignment have been linked to metabolic dysfunction, yet few studies have examined whether within-person annual changes in dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) and alignment influence metabolic outcomes. This study examined whether annual change in DLMO timing and alignment predicted changes in metabolic markers Methods In this secondary analysis participants aged 18-65 with BMI > 25 (N = 89) completed two annual assessments including DLMO, 7-day actigraphy, and metabolic measurements (body fat %, BMI, waist–hip ratio, A1C). Circadian alignment was calculated as the duration between DLMO to sleep onset. Annual change variables were computed as Visit 5 (12-month follow-up) minus baseline. Baseline associations between DLMO and alignment were examined via linear regression. Additional linear regression models tested whether annual changes in DLMO and alignment predicted one-year changes in adiposity and A1C, adjusting for age and sex. Results Participants (age 35.31 ± 9.76 years; 48.2% female) demonstrated an average DLMO shift of –0.35 minutes (SD = 50.5 minutes), indicating essentially no overall delay or advance in circadian phase across 12 months. In contrast, circadian alignment shifted earlier by an average of –1.04 hours (SD = 1.29 hours), reflecting earlier sleep timing relative to circadian phase. Annual change in alignment was initially associated with one-year BMI change; however, the association was not robust and became non-significant after removal of a high-influence observation. Annual change in DLMO did not significantly predict changes in BMI, waist–hip ratio, A1C, or body fat %. In the body fat model, sex (B = –1.71, p = .029) and age (B = –0.09, p = .029) were significant predictors. Conclusion Circadian timing and sleep–circadian alignment were closely related at baseline, and annual alignment shifts were associated with one-year BMI change. However, annual changes in circadian phase and alignment did not consistently predict other metabolic markers. These findings suggest that sleep–circadian alignment may play a role in weight trajectories, although further research is required to clarify these associations. Support (if any) Study was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01ND018517).

SLEEPVol. 49(Supplement_1)
University of Utah (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Rush University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Circadian rhythm and melatonin
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.