Unplanned movement tasks requiring rapid decision-making: a scoping review of study characteristics and methodological approaches

BACKGROUND: The integration of neurocognitive challenges into biomechanical movement tasks has gained attention due to its potential relevance for assessments of physical function, injury risk, and performance. However, a comprehensive mapping of the chosen methodological approaches, targeted populations, and applied outcome measures is still lacking. This scoping review hence aimed to synthesize the current literature on unplanned movement tasks combining cognitive decision-making and biomechanical outcome measurements. METHODS: A systematic literature search following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-extension for scoping reviews) guidelines was performed in Web of Science (Core Collection), MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Included studies combined unplanned movement tasks (e.g., change-of-direction or stopping) with biomechanical assessments. Eligible articles were analysed in terms of participant characteristics, movement type, unplanned task type, reactive stimulus, and biomechanical outcome variables. RESULTS: From the total of 167 studies, the majority focused on change-of-direction tasks (82%), mostly using standardized angles of 45° and moderate approach speeds (3.9 ± 0.9 m/s). Jump (7%), land (12%), and/or stop tasks (3%) were less frequent. Most studies (83%) relied on simple visual cues (e.g., lights or symbols), whereas more ecologically valid stimuli (e.g., videos or real opponents) were rarely applied. Biomechanical analyses predominantly focused on knee angles and moments as well as ground reaction forces, while only 23% of studies included electromyography measurements. Older adults (50+ years) were not represented. CONCLUSION: Although research on unplanned biomechanical tasks is growing, significant methodological heterogeneity and limited ecological validity may constrain the interpretability and applicability of findings. Future research should aim for task designs that better reflect real-world conditions and include diverse populations and comprehensive neuromuscular assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01682-0
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unplanned movement tasks requiring rapid decision-making: a scoping review of study characteristics and methodological approaches

Maximilian Siener, Alexandra Unger, Jan Wilke
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Unplanned movement tasks requiring rapid decision-making: a scoping review of study characteristics and methodological approaches

Maximilian Siener, Alexandra Unger, Jan Wilke
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The integration of neurocognitive challenges into biomechanical movement tasks has gained attention due to its potential relevance for assessments of physical function, injury risk, and performance. However, a comprehensive mapping of the chosen methodological approaches, targeted populations, and applied outcome measures is still lacking. This scoping review hence aimed to synthesize the current literature on unplanned movement tasks combining cognitive decision-making and biomechanical outcome measurements. METHODS: A systematic literature search following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-extension for scoping reviews) guidelines was performed in Web of Science (Core Collection), MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Included studies combined unplanned movement tasks (e.g., change-of-direction or stopping) with biomechanical assessments. Eligible articles were analysed in terms of participant characteristics, movement type, unplanned task type, reactive stimulus, and biomechanical outcome variables. RESULTS: From the total of 167 studies, the majority focused on change-of-direction tasks (82%), mostly using standardized angles of 45° and moderate approach speeds (3.9 ± 0.9 m/s). Jump (7%), land (12%), and/or stop tasks (3%) were less frequent. Most studies (83%) relied on simple visual cues (e.g., lights or symbols), whereas more ecologically valid stimuli (e.g., videos or real opponents) were rarely applied. Biomechanical analyses predominantly focused on knee angles and moments as well as ground reaction forces, while only 23% of studies included electromyography measurements. Older adults (50+ years) were not represented. CONCLUSION: Although research on unplanned biomechanical tasks is growing, significant methodological heterogeneity and limited ecological validity may constrain the interpretability and applicability of findings. Future research should aim for task designs that better reflect real-world conditions and include diverse populations and comprehensive neuromuscular assessments.

BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Pädagogische Hochschule Viktor Frankl Hochschule (AT), University of Klagenfurt (AT), University of Bayreuth (DE)
Universität Bayreuth
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.