Digital twins and multimodal artificial intelligence in spine care: a scoping review of concepts, evidence, and translational barriers

PURPOSE: This scoping review examines current evidence supporting multimodal artificial intelligence, continuous monitoring, and digital twin concepts in spine care. Our primary aims were to (1) characterize the state of digital twin development in spine care, (2) identify key technological and conceptual gaps, and (3) evaluate translational barriers to clinical implementation. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2010 and March 2025. Findings were synthesized qualitatively. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria. Existing spine prediction models demonstrate modest discrimination and are predominantly static. Imaging-based AI shows weak associations with pain and disability. Wearable sensor monitoring is feasible but lacks consistent evidence for improved outcomes. Spine-specific digital twins remain conceptual, with no prospective validation demonstrating improved decision-making. CONCLUSION: Multimodal AI-enabled digital twins represent a compelling conceptual framework for personalized spine care, but current evidence does not support clinical superiority or readiness for implementation. Progress will require prospective validation, standardized data integration, and regulatory clarity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Spine Deformity
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-026-01397-9
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital twins and multimodal artificial intelligence in spine care: a scoping review of concepts, evidence, and translational barriers

Rohan A. Phadke, Nasif Zaman, Samer G. Salman, Alireza Tavakkoli et al.
Spine Deformity
Medical Imaging and Analysis
article

Digital twins and multimodal artificial intelligence in spine care: a scoping review of concepts, evidence, and translational barriers

Rohan A. Phadke, Nasif Zaman, Samer G. Salman, Alireza Tavakkoli, Rahul Kumar
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This scoping review examines current evidence supporting multimodal artificial intelligence, continuous monitoring, and digital twin concepts in spine care. Our primary aims were to (1) characterize the state of digital twin development in spine care, (2) identify key technological and conceptual gaps, and (3) evaluate translational barriers to clinical implementation. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2010 and March 2025. Findings were synthesized qualitatively. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria. Existing spine prediction models demonstrate modest discrimination and are predominantly static. Imaging-based AI shows weak associations with pain and disability. Wearable sensor monitoring is feasible but lacks consistent evidence for improved outcomes. Spine-specific digital twins remain conceptual, with no prospective validation demonstrating improved decision-making. CONCLUSION: Multimodal AI-enabled digital twins represent a compelling conceptual framework for personalized spine care, but current evidence does not support clinical superiority or readiness for implementation. Progress will require prospective validation, standardized data integration, and regulatory clarity.

Spine Deformity
University of Nevada, Reno (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Medical Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.