Epoxy Composites Reinforced with Sol–Gel Synthesized Alumina–Silica, Alumina, and Natural Silica Fillers: Comparative Mechanical Performance

Epoxy resins are widely used thermosetting polymers, but their limited toughness and flexural resilience restrict broader applications. In this study, diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) epoxy was reinforced with 5 wt.% ceramic fillers of different origins: sol–gel alumina calcined at 550 °C (γ-Al2O3) and 1000 °C (α-Al2O3), silica derived from rice husk, silica from diatomaceous earth, and a hybrid alumina–silica mixture prepared by sol–gel and calcined at 1000 °C. Fillers were structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Mechanical properties were evaluated through tensile (ASTM D638) and flexural (ASTM D790) testing. All reinforcements enhanced the performance of neat epoxy. γ-Al2O3 provided superior tensile reinforcement compared to α-Al2O3, underscoring the importance of particle morphology and surface reactivity. The hybrid alumina–silica filler achieved the highest flexural strength of 50.6 MPa, compared to 9.91 MPa for the neat epoxy. Bio-derived silica showed improved flexural properties, although its tensile reinforcement was less pronounced compared to the sol–gel derived fillers. These results establish clear structure–property relationships and confirm that filler phase, morphology, and calcination temperature critically govern the mechanical performance of epoxy composites.